Accepted rofi 0.15.12-1 (source amd64) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 18:48:35 -0500
Source: rofi
Binary: rofi
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.15.12-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jason Pleau <jason@jpleau.ca>
Changed-By: Jason Pleau <jason@jpleau.ca>
Description:
rofi - window switcher, run dialog and dmenu replacement
Changes:
rofi (0.15.12-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release
* Update Standards-Version to 3.9.7, no changes needed
* Use https transport for Vcs-* fields
Checksums-Sha1:
bbfe17a8ad5e3b7c4794a41c5fbdd4ee8b91ea5c 1896 rofi_0.15.12-1.dsc
cd7532dc2f2da14659223904ab2c564358886130 966863 rofi_0.15.12.orig.tar.gz
e7fc1b85efd9fe4cebe23810b3c90a5a6a2b8379 2328 rofi_0.15.12-1.debian.tar.xz
156c948ba6faf5254cb714b6c4d9387bde2384ff 143200 rofi-dbgsym_0.15.12-1_amd64.deb
3411010cd411460cdf0c5541a31bb0786b71c253 63650 rofi_0.15.12-1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
6857e57d60adf81b662f974338ea12778846e42434d91e49064c1b56d6778907 1896 rofi_0.15.12-1.dsc
e5e6b0ed01fd1186652af2488ca2e7780cbde5f0750d9482eb816bae447f4e84 966863 rofi_0.15.12.orig.tar.gz
6c0f72d9499fff8b21f714485dc748de4f4302a17b05e58e7af5a21ccfc9d1fc 2328 rofi_0.15.12-1.debian.tar.xz
badafd068ce86f90ceb90bf7bc630aa42ea27301e3ad9195c3b9ddca2ea15c57 143200 rofi-dbgsym_0.15.12-1_amd64.deb
7457af7ed50e181c4e6eaa61ec352feb7be6bdef6632957c786de5654a4dfa72 63650 rofi_0.15.12-1_amd64.deb
Files:
9b51baeb58d3b7139af2541472f76e7d 1896 x11 optional rofi_0.15.12-1.dsc
cb5b8d646a31425495134a230ac3bd48 966863 x11 optional rofi_0.15.12.orig.tar.gz
f19fb066c089575711c96a395cc8ef8a 2328 x11 optional rofi_0.15.12-1.debian.tar.xz
b01528261995298068323cac9a2e56d0 143200 debug extra rofi-dbgsym_0.15.12-1_amd64.deb
f1e2d56e48ce250d4db7cc754b689760 63650 x11 optional rofi_0.15.12-1_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=Fzdr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: