[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted 389-ds-base 1.3.4.8-2 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 08:13:38 +0200
Source: 389-ds-base
Binary: 389-ds 389-ds-base-libs 389-ds-base-libs-dbg 389-ds-base-dev 389-ds-base 389-ds-base-dbg
Architecture: source
Version: 1.3.4.8-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian 389ds Team <pkg-fedora-ds-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Timo Aaltonen <tjaalton@debian.org>
Description:
 389-ds     - 389 Directory Server suite - metapackage
 389-ds-base - 389 Directory Server suite - server
 389-ds-base-dbg - 389 Directory Server suite - server debugging symbols
 389-ds-base-dev - 389 Directory Server suite - development files
 389-ds-base-libs - 389 Directory Server suite - libraries
 389-ds-base-libs-dbg - 389 Directory Server suite - library debugging symbols
Closes: 775550
Changes:
 389-ds-base (1.3.4.8-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * postinst: Silence ls and adduser.
   * Drop the init file, we depend on systemd anyway.
   * rules: Don't enable dirsrv-snmp.service by default.
   * postrm: Clean up /var/lib/dirsrv/scripts-* on purge.
   * user-perl-move.diff: Use move instead of rename during upgrade.
     (Closes: #775550)
Checksums-Sha1:
 efd839ffcdeb24c93e5e0238d59f132022c7a5a1 2578 389-ds-base_1.3.4.8-2.dsc
 4175b1ebcfa103e755703386cabda91a7e6941f3 22608 389-ds-base_1.3.4.8-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 9dac3acbac5faaa617b36861027dec37d4d56a9711932c98c7dbad655bca762a 2578 389-ds-base_1.3.4.8-2.dsc
 28082f12ac1a069d3937e23df99d0d3e366e3eefef39b28e9803617428e3f474 22608 389-ds-base_1.3.4.8-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 ee6d23b42eab7d3b216a1951254a9829 2578 net optional 389-ds-base_1.3.4.8-2.dsc
 b39c8c083c327bccdaa7a0b78d8f04b9 22608 net optional 389-ds-base_1.3.4.8-2.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=70D9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: