[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted gajim 0.16.5-1 (source all) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2016 16:21:53 +0100
Source: gajim
Binary: gajim
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.16.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Tanguy Ortolo <tanguy+debian@ortolo.eu>
Changed-By: Norbert Tretkowski <norbert@tretkowski.de>
Description:
 gajim      - GTK+-based Jabber client
Closes: 813763
Changes:
 gajim (0.16.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/control:
     - add myself to Uploaders
     - remove python-farstream from suggestions, it got dropped from unstable
       (closes: #813763)
     - update Standards-Version to 3.9.7 (no changes needed)
   * debian/watch: update to fix checking for newer upstream versions
   * debian/gajim.menu: removed to fix lintian warning
Checksums-Sha1:
 a9c6e2d045f69385ca5836d2016028129d542762 1924 gajim_0.16.5-1.dsc
 ce8df7844b12b6893627a1a393668944a8797d65 7884 gajim_0.16.5-1.debian.tar.xz
 a821aa0348548aa2ff396bca7eef15e914ad3417 3065386 gajim_0.16.5-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 fd03b93b0e469e2aeed0702d67f17e589f7c482e8f7ce70a3156450016da4256 1924 gajim_0.16.5-1.dsc
 a183bc03b362220906347288b9356aa59af17fda8fc93d24d2a56dd453be48c5 7884 gajim_0.16.5-1.debian.tar.xz
 b5770ee980dc9b8dacc57a3507e193f04c36c356f4359234f03a57fd8904e52c 3065386 gajim_0.16.5-1_all.deb
Files:
 980a5cb81b5d1392cc604bb10371e7fb 1924 net optional gajim_0.16.5-1.dsc
 52126ced80eae105cf18f4ecc0c1102e 7884 net optional gajim_0.16.5-1.debian.tar.xz
 852ffaddadcd1d445f39db2ab6794341 3065386 net optional gajim_0.16.5-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=JVYT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: