[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted ruby2.3 2.3.0-3 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 21:45:51 +0100
Source: ruby2.3
Binary: ruby2.3 libruby2.3 libruby2.3-dbg ruby2.3-dev ruby2.3-doc ruby2.3-tcltk
Architecture: source
Version: 2.3.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>
Changed-By: Christian Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org>
Description:
 libruby2.3 - Libraries necessary to run Ruby 2.3
 libruby2.3-dbg - Debugging symbols for libruby2.3
 ruby2.3    - Interpreter of object-oriented scripting language Ruby
 ruby2.3-dev - Header files for compiling extension modules for the Ruby 2.3
 ruby2.3-doc - Documentation for Ruby 2.3
 ruby2.3-tcltk - Ruby/Tk for Ruby 2.3
Closes: 810321
Changes:
 ruby2.3 (2.3.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Explicitly set bundled gem dates. Otherwise these multi-arch same files
     differ on different architectures depending on build date.
     (Closes: #810321)
   * Apply patch from upstream (ruby-core:72736, trunk r53455) to fix extension
     builds that use g++.
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.7 with no addtl. changes
   * d/copyright: Remove rake, no longer bundled.
   * Switch Vcs-* URLs to https.
Checksums-Sha1:
 e32b909e6a148c33104c7a495ab7c920de7f3367 2488 ruby2.3_2.3.0-3.dsc
 d828f10a483329981867e37588f286e50aaf6cf7 91092 ruby2.3_2.3.0-3.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 e7c7f5480655ebde870bade05a13d02365fd6aec338eea93d2717a0e0298fb83 2488 ruby2.3_2.3.0-3.dsc
 390a4277da7b4dbb8e3c57b73af9d570530dcfc346f630035f9020d8b3fbb305 91092 ruby2.3_2.3.0-3.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 d4575b9e9796db68ecc742f0dcb2140c 2488 ruby extra ruby2.3_2.3.0-3.dsc
 1a878558c8ed0f53a703c59ba4ecf32b 91092 ruby extra ruby2.3_2.3.0-3.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=Oenz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: