[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted rkflashtool 0~20160221-1 (source amd64) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 15:29:57 +0100
Source: rkflashtool
Binary: rkflashtool
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0~20160221-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Philipp Hug <hug@debian.org>
Changed-By: Philipp Hug <philipp@hug.cx>
Description:
 rkflashtool - Tools for flashing Rockchip devices
Changes:
 rkflashtool (0~20160221-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   New upstream version.
   * Add support for RK3368, RK3228 and RK3229
Checksums-Sha1:
 cc5cfb3218a909110ee34396dd73d4b183c2b4c3 1893 rkflashtool_0~20160221-1.dsc
 162c57333a3e64b12f77383e02da1ecf65490406 17523 rkflashtool_0~20160221.orig.tar.gz
 17df26246a9e2fdbc1b9ef5cc2a90c0f2f2af3a8 2188 rkflashtool_0~20160221-1.debian.tar.xz
 950a99e297bd27ac683d81d18aa6b9a3c4bdc22a 17942 rkflashtool_0~20160221-1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 5ea6e6a88769edeee7e6cdff48754b39fce4c7fc60f0bbf48c93feafee8a0dab 1893 rkflashtool_0~20160221-1.dsc
 a5884488864b9e50be19ea272ed81f76bb7f3451f230031481f3cb27bf92a056 17523 rkflashtool_0~20160221.orig.tar.gz
 5444fdaa3ff26131089860bfae1762316e65966d541c6165a105eabfb11d0b63 2188 rkflashtool_0~20160221-1.debian.tar.xz
 3f4f40d19b5c9c832db4a77311bae9e5916dee7fc6e1da0d739ad9bf3c884b0d 17942 rkflashtool_0~20160221-1_amd64.deb
Files:
 074fdd37f5e56ce7d382283614926922 1893 embedded optional rkflashtool_0~20160221-1.dsc
 692102e338e43790fd3b4f598c1b80d7 17523 embedded optional rkflashtool_0~20160221.orig.tar.gz
 bfc998367f34e7add019f28e70fbcbe2 2188 embedded optional rkflashtool_0~20160221-1.debian.tar.xz
 64cce299ea38254bf684c5927c4af9bc 17942 embedded optional rkflashtool_0~20160221-1_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=3hls
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: