[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted rjava 0.9-8-2 (source amd64) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 21:18:14 -0600
Source: rjava
Binary: r-cran-rjava
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.9-8-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
Changed-By: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
Description:
 r-cran-rjava - GNU R low-level interface to Java
Closes: 814789
Changes:
 rjava (0.9-8-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/control: Build-Depends on r-base-core (> 3.2.3-6) to ensure
     jdk8 is used across R and rJava		 	(Closes: #814789)
Checksums-Sha1:
 b9d9b43b331d7eb69538e100db840a17e40b96e5 1751 rjava_0.9-8-2.dsc
 2b1295ea61a1319901bd11bb31366f2c8bd6ac01 2735 rjava_0.9-8-2.diff.gz
 540abf3ae37004c3987d35d2e38b3449e4ede6e7 129212 r-cran-rjava-dbgsym_0.9-8-2_amd64.deb
 d4839a29bafffe99528770636fb5b87af8f46806 538680 r-cran-rjava_0.9-8-2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 4c05f6f01b42872340169900a8e5c995bddbed89cff842856b699bf47bdd1f41 1751 rjava_0.9-8-2.dsc
 b2619a5a58b9cd478543d650d0d1624f19a3fee76737172e06bb537d179b1e44 2735 rjava_0.9-8-2.diff.gz
 299ed921ce1ab18ec7422dd629a5e40de2f54ea474ecdfc39951d834cebc9498 129212 r-cran-rjava-dbgsym_0.9-8-2_amd64.deb
 b872ca5978c6e39bcb70dae44db13b9a030a72ee0c74d30f24b3c8d1174a2e7c 538680 r-cran-rjava_0.9-8-2_amd64.deb
Files:
 664c9fda54a0a358b00a1ae34aba3f2a 1751 gnu-r optional rjava_0.9-8-2.dsc
 70550dcb97e16f0fbdab505ca4c473a6 2735 gnu-r optional rjava_0.9-8-2.diff.gz
 0440dcea62ac636b936c2bd8dad0b157 129212 debug extra r-cran-rjava-dbgsym_0.9-8-2_amd64.deb
 9edb2a500245da48a3464a7ca63d9c71 538680 gnu-r optional r-cran-rjava_0.9-8-2_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=FlgY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: