Accepted dh-kpatches 0.99.36+nmu2 (source all) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 22:45:13 -0500
Source: dh-kpatches
Binary: dh-kpatches kernel-patch-scripts
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.99.36+nmu2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Yann Dirson <dirson@debian.org>
Changed-By: Neil Roeth <neil@debian.org>
Description:
dh-kpatches - Debhelper script to help packaging kernel patches
kernel-patch-scripts - Scripts to help dealing with packaged kernel patches
Closes: 809599
Changes:
dh-kpatches (0.99.36+nmu2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Changed build dependency from openjade1.3 to openjade because
openjade1.3 will be removed from Debian. (Closes: #809599).
Checksums-Sha1:
51f16f8dd6e5e6f86e0331fb0ab89ee1ccb906ae 1596 dh-kpatches_0.99.36+nmu2.dsc
72894d6dedb0dbe0bf95e2b0a4d8a898e16a4cc3 53665 dh-kpatches_0.99.36+nmu2.tar.gz
c33e188ede57e0cba642f535672bbfb4ae3f9b5d 155700 dh-kpatches_0.99.36+nmu2_all.deb
ed5b5605b4cf40485c9e431ffc6c54a718f8b02b 16086 kernel-patch-scripts_0.99.36+nmu2_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
565a5ab8e4f269ff9f10af398c6b60e972d4828fe00907b40f7a843b60942d8a 1596 dh-kpatches_0.99.36+nmu2.dsc
772f6d745be1b3531f1bc1802ad4525ee532762e63ff382e09c30cf14dc1ca30 53665 dh-kpatches_0.99.36+nmu2.tar.gz
cde0b9e371c63f05bb9b9f85e4c6bed3251d0913250f7fb4e7366f82035d4c64 155700 dh-kpatches_0.99.36+nmu2_all.deb
0399fa101a45ec8c80b218e33f5874184cbcca37887286848cdb05952a9ae611 16086 kernel-patch-scripts_0.99.36+nmu2_all.deb
Files:
64a7e3de700b0b265b0ffa616f9e60e5 1596 devel extra dh-kpatches_0.99.36+nmu2.dsc
162deca075809435e3d9a0f8037fd547 53665 devel extra dh-kpatches_0.99.36+nmu2.tar.gz
38fe2ded785dd71d439fcf3977209ae0 155700 devel extra dh-kpatches_0.99.36+nmu2_all.deb
42f6794d90906b11fb4e9a24b9212e4a 16086 devel optional kernel-patch-scripts_0.99.36+nmu2_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=ifOo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: