[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted ruby-appraiser 0.2.0-1 (source all) into unstable, unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 06:53:00 +0800
Source: ruby-appraiser
Binary: ruby-appraiser
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.2.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers <pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Andrew Lee (李健秋) <andrew.lee@collabora.co.uk>
Description:
 ruby-appraiser - simple rubygems subcommand for Gemfile.
Closes: 811030
Changes:
 ruby-appraiser (0.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Initial release (Closes: #811030)
Checksums-Sha1:
 a6e78274f5ef34cf0be7f86b1535552d76e66553 2117 ruby-appraiser_0.2.0-1.dsc
 84db57dd73e19d6784ba732c6508b3740ab119eb 5891 ruby-appraiser_0.2.0.orig.tar.gz
 93de9dd3ca420c5721595977307d39a1496a8ef0 2424 ruby-appraiser_0.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 2a41b0eaa2fb415d2c0415794b78454e99a4c0d1 4336 ruby-appraiser_0.2.0-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 d82c04b5121f5cf3cb324fcf98b5bc6abb9a7442cac6e9a3fb3a3ee76f7216a6 2117 ruby-appraiser_0.2.0-1.dsc
 16cb914f45b014f582bc1f857476b6c7552d6e5ab57d6810771f8433716a35a2 5891 ruby-appraiser_0.2.0.orig.tar.gz
 0070cd093e35d847e7bc21d486dbea3effd8c36fda605d511d7cbee3bc5817f9 2424 ruby-appraiser_0.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 e15e28fcd656f409138a974edd773c0a7aeb5d2180050082f6b09b7c55159223 4336 ruby-appraiser_0.2.0-1_all.deb
Files:
 5b11be9cd947a96896fb58b129d7428d 2117 ruby optional ruby-appraiser_0.2.0-1.dsc
 25e0e8a183a0ecd86b6226c98321c12d 5891 ruby optional ruby-appraiser_0.2.0.orig.tar.gz
 371607e2687de2b43507102a2cd50c58 2424 ruby optional ruby-appraiser_0.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 7e96e47f7fe1d75cd7e11294e5853ce3 4336 ruby optional ruby-appraiser_0.2.0-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=bYxF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: