Accepted btrbk 0.22.0-1 (source all) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 20:54:31 +0100
Source: btrbk
Binary: btrbk
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.22.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Axel Burri <axel@tty0.ch>
Changed-By: Axel Burri <axel@tty0.ch>
Description:
btrbk - backup tool for btrfs volumes
Changes:
btrbk (0.22.0-1) unstable; urgency=high
.
* New upstream release.
* Bugfix: fix monthly schedule if older than 10 weeks.
* Bugfix: fix sprintf used by config option "timestamp_format long"
when using perl-5.22.0.
* Bugfix: fix "--progress" option.
* Added "clean" command.
* Added "-n, --dry-run" option.
* Added configuration options "raw_target_compress_level",
"raw_target_compress_threads".
* Added "stats" command.
* Print "$hostname:$path" instead of "{$hostname}$path" in summary
and logs.
Checksums-Sha1:
0fd70a06862be8b48d55fc53f06cd5418af9265c 1769 btrbk_0.22.0-1.dsc
35f91721dbf44311aafb7da1131bc1b5c43da1d3 63828 btrbk_0.22.0.orig.tar.gz
33a4e1b7b2296d042e4d19f7514690568c391f9c 4104 btrbk_0.22.0-1.debian.tar.xz
57dd1d6ade5428dd0b393dd50e80602655e99ddc 54372 btrbk_0.22.0-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
eb138e0e1154916d498661971a6c84d09c1e95cf2d24bb08ee082325777ae809 1769 btrbk_0.22.0-1.dsc
d9bb7782adea6d97a1a16dcb5cd6a54543152c05ccb6fed580c9118cd5d4b095 63828 btrbk_0.22.0.orig.tar.gz
fb0ec5a9a0717fab12c524816cab2bee82940f89bb7bb858158ab55191c4043b 4104 btrbk_0.22.0-1.debian.tar.xz
0d3d5f58596e871f93757ae973e84539207a5573c87dd88857004779ec7d03a1 54372 btrbk_0.22.0-1_all.deb
Files:
ce28d26b09df8025c2061c5ec5f1bf47 1769 utils optional btrbk_0.22.0-1.dsc
ee2ecf3afe32741814c259f56d453b2d 63828 utils optional btrbk_0.22.0.orig.tar.gz
ec0224439e57047362c4065ac7d58ae3 4104 utils optional btrbk_0.22.0-1.debian.tar.xz
f2e2334549afa431e973cfdad44e84e9 54372 utils optional btrbk_0.22.0-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=NJUC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: