Accepted openntpd 1:5.7p4-2 (source amd64) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:09:13 -0300
Source: openntpd
Binary: openntpd
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:5.7p4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Ulises Vitulli <dererk@debian.org>
Changed-By: Ulises Vitulli <dererk@debian.org>
Description:
openntpd - OpenBSD NTP daemon
Closes: 769146 798388
Changes:
openntpd (1:5.7p4-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Merged from experimental to unstable, 'some-water-under-the-bridge' dupload.
* Temporary remove apparmor profile, avoid colision with ntp's at
apparmor-profiles-extras (Closes: #769146, for now).
* Replace and declare conflict on systemd-timesyncd.service.
Thanks VincentBlut (Closes: #798388).
Checksums-Sha1:
f08e840146f9563c245d1f2cfa6b5ad8a7159d7f 1896 openntpd_5.7p4-2.dsc
864d3b3fe6b3ac93f9a7107820821e2aa28abeeb 15252 openntpd_5.7p4-2.debian.tar.xz
eb243810c38d1920feca02c7e0129fea7375fa93 113818 openntpd-dbgsym_5.7p4-2_amd64.deb
e5ecdf8919ccb6a491e8339e20ca9ec15d6f6a0b 67506 openntpd_5.7p4-2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
6246a42162688f362f2d4b79c2599f50a92dc10dbc51a9a29208318104efa2c5 1896 openntpd_5.7p4-2.dsc
d7279e8d2235060abed1dfce71caadb990d2f9cd9a17d221b5322b3193a5a72e 15252 openntpd_5.7p4-2.debian.tar.xz
cd9b5e6132cbd2d1324894855e71908071f39c68d5e287b69e04d89f96f7cb1a 113818 openntpd-dbgsym_5.7p4-2_amd64.deb
91b55e4f1265fc4d573a2e8121d77acd84b851d17390a4a7e02d9b3da74aafd1 67506 openntpd_5.7p4-2_amd64.deb
Files:
2277059d7432f54dc885591aa82fd390 1896 net optional openntpd_5.7p4-2.dsc
1585533befe19880df54f61d230affdd 15252 net optional openntpd_5.7p4-2.debian.tar.xz
c7f55bd15443e00c1db052fcf9ea8a61 113818 debug extra openntpd-dbgsym_5.7p4-2_amd64.deb
2cc13c35f7756d54cb9d218b6cd5d0cf 67506 net optional openntpd_5.7p4-2_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=pofE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: