Accepted vramsteg 1.1.0-1 (source amd64) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 16:35:22 +0000
Source: vramsteg
Binary: vramsteg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.1.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alejandro Garrido Mota <alejandro@debian.org>
Changed-By: Alejandro Garrido Mota <alejandro@debian.org>
Description:
vramsteg - provide shell scripts with a full-featured progress indicator
Changes:
vramsteg (1.1.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release.
* Add watch file
* Update Standards-Version to 3.9.6
* Remove vramsteg.doc file: NEWS and README (files referenced) don't
point out relevant information.
Checksums-Sha1:
e3a23f1727faebb4ca6fd929b2d15af03ce1e351 1809 vramsteg_1.1.0-1.dsc
c6e51b3584054143ed6f0eaa4edaa0b0a8f47542 12535 vramsteg_1.1.0.orig.tar.gz
c05d11fe52c68e58bd2f6168d93c31b15b4e8429 2196 vramsteg_1.1.0-1.debian.tar.xz
7deb83f89c9915ae867030056bea7d677f2645b5 16010 vramsteg_1.1.0-1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
a5e49e358d637d7fe6218e3028029c0ccc3e23023d659ff0b601d09e963aae2b 1809 vramsteg_1.1.0-1.dsc
9cc82eb195e4673d9ee6151373746bd22513033e96411ffc1d250920801f7037 12535 vramsteg_1.1.0.orig.tar.gz
8c1c51ec6a33bdebf5bac32807e9b3b7d014ae79cd76ea563197e29d8d606be6 2196 vramsteg_1.1.0-1.debian.tar.xz
f5c0c7fee30389267b9215b7963cb1b1ed22561fff89069c2d120ca8b23b6ec4 16010 vramsteg_1.1.0-1_amd64.deb
Files:
ae190fb56c86df474beeb93711a1a0d7 1809 utils extra vramsteg_1.1.0-1.dsc
380c583e3445b3551f56f195ae2324db 12535 utils extra vramsteg_1.1.0.orig.tar.gz
b8eec6adb8a2f5790c6f3f6a81f66ef2 2196 utils extra vramsteg_1.1.0-1.debian.tar.xz
8888d97be571e3cf57d1a2e1fc1b9ed1 16010 utils extra vramsteg_1.1.0-1_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=ZMBQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: