Accepted gnome-do 0.95.3-4 (source amd64) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:41:18 +1100
Source: gnome-do
Binary: gnome-do
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.95.3-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian CLI Applications Team <pkg-cli-apps-team@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Christopher James Halse Rogers <raof@ubuntu.com>
Description:
gnome-do - Quickly perform actions on your desktop
Closes: 801889
Changes:
gnome-do (0.95.3-4) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Andreas Henriksson ]
* debian/control: Drop librsvg and wnck cil build-deps
- looks unused/unneeded and are no longer available in the archive.
(Closes: 801889)
* debian/patches/05_drop_gnome_desktop_2.diff:
- bump to use gnome-desktop soname .12
* debian/control: Bump libgnome-desktop-3-dev build-dep to >= 3.18
- to match the previous change.
Checksums-Sha1:
c6aafbcd9fa5b48dc4772c4666ac721333f0d676 2549 gnome-do_0.95.3-4.dsc
d7acc89ec01230edce42d65b1d740f9f8190cf26 35608 gnome-do_0.95.3-4.debian.tar.xz
fd02d2f96af6c3902fd9701ff58147d46487fedf 373184 gnome-do_0.95.3-4_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
cb50ff300bd2ec82592c9f7e25c4bd0fde9b3f767d4efcb05dfc8303a7fb3804 2549 gnome-do_0.95.3-4.dsc
e929e66aa75b8469d64e09e6d33aa82f2c986f83fa7546299f9dde501ce9a32d 35608 gnome-do_0.95.3-4.debian.tar.xz
c367a0c3a81e61779d65bfab673a7e58f6b8927197d3a427b3ac98027e8dfc4c 373184 gnome-do_0.95.3-4_amd64.deb
Files:
0ee73f3dc801f0eb118f62333c5133fa 2549 gnome optional gnome-do_0.95.3-4.dsc
29fb6eed2520c3fadbb0425907272671 35608 gnome optional gnome-do_0.95.3-4.debian.tar.xz
4a70c6e4821ae435478491a117b58751 373184 gnome optional gnome-do_0.95.3-4_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=V3Y1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: