[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted company-mode 0.8.12-4 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 21:37:22 -0300
Source: company-mode
Binary: elpa-company
Architecture: source
Version: 0.8.12-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Emacs addons team <pkg-emacsen-addons@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: David Bremner <bremner@debian.org>
Description:
 elpa-company - Modular in-buffer completion framework for Emacs
Closes: 798701
Changes:
 company-mode (0.8.12-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Rebuild with dh-elpa 0.13. Fix for "unowned directory after purge:
     /usr/share/emacs24/site-lisp/elpa/", thanks to Andreas Beckmann (Closes:
     #798701).
   * Enable upstream tests.
Checksums-Sha1:
 feaeb38dcb24a0eb4ffff0ea99fda95270516f92 1805 company-mode_0.8.12-4.dsc
 7a1bb18efc2879fc2473152cf3b76031d9a1aa7f 2336 company-mode_0.8.12-4.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 f4e08233bd8de84d1c4e897bccd666b087b37b7a89aefe44d5f34e58baddf689 1805 company-mode_0.8.12-4.dsc
 55769339e53ff1fd589176a86efa7c42b93704d4bdd1c2025570470a9eae22c2 2336 company-mode_0.8.12-4.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 1f3dd83346dae831589e807b74868886 1805 lisp optional company-mode_0.8.12-4.dsc
 b98fcb3a1392a8080c07a3d2b28668da 2336 lisp optional company-mode_0.8.12-4.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=iLOU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: