Accepted numatop 1.0.3-2 (source amd64) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 21:57:00 +0100
Source: numatop
Binary: numatop
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Changed-By: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Description:
numatop - NUMA runtime observation tool
Changes:
numatop (1.0.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Fix sign comparison issue comparing g_run_secs and diff_ms
* Add sanity checking to reg_init() errors
* remove null pointer check on nrec, it is always non-NULL
* Initialize naccess_total to zero
* common/os: pfwrapper: make loop index a uint64_t type
* common/os: map: tidy up gcc warning, make i an unsigned int
* Only process pipe read if read was successful
* tty colors are broken without using use_default_colors()
* mgen: calibrate_cpuinfo: ensure we do not overflow buffer unit
* calibrate_cpuinfo: ensure we do not overflow buffer unit
Checksums-Sha1:
c859f9f88ae781987d8cf206275401536da28198 1740 numatop_1.0.3-2.dsc
de01fcacaccb34a0ac2c7e81eb1bd390af028eea 8480 numatop_1.0.3-2.debian.tar.xz
e8beee3972bc64c1b9a2f147781d6fe70d9acdc2 51476 numatop_1.0.3-2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
129397d5dca8583e867dcd71fb064cae9f0f3f4e9aeea733ab2ff785612daae5 1740 numatop_1.0.3-2.dsc
54590525e120875679bdc482c213b24db45318762cc4d90a47ac4f93648155c6 8480 numatop_1.0.3-2.debian.tar.xz
df7f26621429cd37f751573c2671fbebd88887f130305c5515d9c194b4a69f89 51476 numatop_1.0.3-2_amd64.deb
Files:
824c39a7ed49e00cb813dc63cb9b8827 1740 admin optional numatop_1.0.3-2.dsc
f40ff472cab36adf7e0b39c5e902b21c 8480 admin optional numatop_1.0.3-2.debian.tar.xz
aaf04282d58cee2ad5fae0e22fb523b8 51476 admin optional numatop_1.0.3-2_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=wQbE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: