Accepted opam 1.2.2-2 (source all amd64) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 21:35:28 +0000
Source: opam
Binary: opam opam-docs
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.2.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@debian.org>
Description:
opam - package manager for OCaml
opam-docs - package manager for OCaml (documentation)
Changes:
opam (1.2.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Run testsuite only on native architectures: Testsuite uses ocamlopt
unconditionally, which fails on bytecode architectures. Next upstream
release might fix that.
Checksums-Sha1:
fade513101ede1da502bc52f50794df35c9adf31 2339 opam_1.2.2-2.dsc
998a36c9ae2250798a0dfa8cee1a5991dca1cc1e 4420 opam_1.2.2-2.debian.tar.xz
ad66e988cb09ec82e58539bedd214042673c745b 318910 opam-docs_1.2.2-2_all.deb
7c4d9e41f40788a75aa5cfb29f2b84a3637c70f2 1479984 opam_1.2.2-2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
f8c68bbce96c16a0d17e5e2e2f999863254125df92cddd5ea519b74cdddba19d 2339 opam_1.2.2-2.dsc
51dd91e25bd59e2a3522e279f6a7f0f867a50ad884da7ceb266f6a12f14e8787 4420 opam_1.2.2-2.debian.tar.xz
e44a1ba1a93dfb03e5d754651a8a03e7a472443ac07644766d0bc0f88c09ccee 318910 opam-docs_1.2.2-2_all.deb
22fab563c41ce576307bf9a957018c49edad495bd9347825308e0b6e09c8c43e 1479984 opam_1.2.2-2_amd64.deb
Files:
adea372cdf29394347860118f6f43805 2339 ocaml optional opam_1.2.2-2.dsc
308b2cbd27f707d06dfd96d408a3d2c5 4420 ocaml optional opam_1.2.2-2.debian.tar.xz
6ec3f350556414d2c66c6c1f67bebc35 318910 doc optional opam-docs_1.2.2-2_all.deb
ecb3c670213c46c5b413b1d68cae7d44 1479984 ocaml optional opam_1.2.2-2_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=gu71
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: