Accepted ckport 0.1~rc1-5 (source all) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 18:26:46 +0200
Source: ckport
Binary: ckport ckport-database
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1~rc1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Patrick Matthäi <pmatthaei@debian.org>
Changed-By: Patrick Matthäi <pmatthaei@debian.org>
Description:
ckport - portability analysis and security checking tool
ckport-database - portability analysis and security checking tool (Database files)
Changes:
ckport (0.1~rc1-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6 (no changes needed).
* Don't explicitly request xz compression - dpkg 1.17 does this by default.
* Update to DEP5 debian/copyright format.
* Fix lintian warning debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature.
Checksums-Sha1:
b70d1456803aa49386733c0b12bda22f4e23576a 1764 ckport_0.1~rc1-5.dsc
f2ea64a8f97a6d7afe73bde4dddbdc9e1f26ef36 17740 ckport_0.1~rc1-5.debian.tar.xz
eb437f5dc2708f5d79ca8cce40ca83e08f7837b0 5752 ckport-database_0.1~rc1-5_all.deb
e665cddc4ac867a26b351e5d1947dfab07c595e3 8988 ckport_0.1~rc1-5_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
7b7252a577eb124d0cfa61bafef64700798427bbba9f8505cba901b8d5b138cb 1764 ckport_0.1~rc1-5.dsc
4ed73f7f1e4a4732bef116cecc07db7ee406eed835ae675db91af64440dfc44e 17740 ckport_0.1~rc1-5.debian.tar.xz
f10d8c85d1756da328274c76a4c14c83eb5999d67613d9614ef5f87661bbbc60 5752 ckport-database_0.1~rc1-5_all.deb
1244b5b6c4edde84aec016be294cf3bafd646c6e8bab8d2e87e9ca6e483fbdbe 8988 ckport_0.1~rc1-5_all.deb
Files:
fb595bc5ffb8e8cd05e3857d0ca89748 1764 devel optional ckport_0.1~rc1-5.dsc
6e87614de180706de38cf30d6ef4283f 17740 devel optional ckport_0.1~rc1-5.debian.tar.xz
9dc2b843e5197b318144e0b999bb1e36 5752 devel optional ckport-database_0.1~rc1-5_all.deb
7faea3ca6f1b52340f496c02c76af69e 8988 devel optional ckport_0.1~rc1-5_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVnAEkAAoJEBLZsEqQy9jk9tkP/jdozMTG8+9jcxwsxi3f2Qp2
z7onmOZWpd1DineF1jwzH1pmGOZFm9HbpCJTqn4ZKmm5+EsRDUKXTvlvHJ3eU4H/
/e98AG9tGDthTyaX1KW0F0txA2FIs/Q1rnNTS3/oPvwUVNiF2v3MIkq3L51NQTKR
6xu8pszAcsEc8hhluSA4miCzgunc2E/jicyYuDMZg8dQpw33DPR3OYh34utLdKqX
8IHDNSsxzfjLxDLokfwjXz68G2oX/bP68wi9llm3Dsk4iGd1yndwfGoaIWG3MBH8
Yiuak+O7K661qTwTF3RTHdWq0b1xmVbwrlpxlkq+qNq1/Iz5M7XGl/ko1S2Co6w1
PRdiBQlUheHtvGGbSuStrF4lvZBmo3oVV1KBuZoarPbi0LwMjMRHcQNde4fTRsA0
5NcSAuSE8tIKDFzzl4jNzay22+AfKsjaJZ8nBcMLOezTi+ELOYOm2UxUOMio3nkP
m0sSMBG+eQx0WKqS/8qr5xDQE7lWjOkN6+Qj0flonWiJpvzOcNlYf7I9+5bs55iI
+4jlIoU4rjD5J3+wMfyr86I2KybVHafeKjLwGfWC2VLUrf+3xqIGGMT/ilBTDCv6
2FYsYo4FHrr0IIe6I5PvC2DV/eIPagxfSmMtD5/DXXfdB+1AJJxu0gm1Rlghn34j
aGdtGe8A1cLG5mTwbJTP
=V5Lm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: