[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted sslsplit 0.4.10+dfsg-1 (source amd64) into unstable, unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 08:27:26 +0100
Source: sslsplit
Binary: sslsplit
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.4.10+dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Hilko Bengen <bengen@debian.org>
Changed-By: Hilko Bengen <bengen@debian.org>
Description:
 sslsplit   - transparent and scalable SSL/TLS interception
Changes:
 sslsplit (0.4.10+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream version
   * Updated patch queue
   * Fixed build, install
Checksums-Sha1:
 f7279cbda8125f52f1a32f60038eaf587b1fe47f 1779 sslsplit_0.4.10+dfsg-1.dsc
 1e121dcdfb028fdf117cf023a0d165969d20e614 86360 sslsplit_0.4.10+dfsg.orig.tar.bz2
 731515e018aea22d79df2e157dd4533cbcbb4c9c 6648 sslsplit_0.4.10+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz
 c56896a8b89b123aa7dffe7fa8bfe82504ed5029 60466 sslsplit_0.4.10+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 c8615d965bc5182f83ade8d5e3f06e3a335c2edabf45323d8f09a6a62acb548e 1779 sslsplit_0.4.10+dfsg-1.dsc
 2980b647a05b037f793451ebf2b130acd9f8b06685e3279496e03e2d6d29fcd6 86360 sslsplit_0.4.10+dfsg.orig.tar.bz2
 f398212b9eb544318999e8cf4bd00841ff13606cd9d91933a0557c250dd36e52 6648 sslsplit_0.4.10+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz
 e84c32ff248b1782021a71e57e7e2bd7f5759d607d39f90ec89ac0d4aa12db13 60466 sslsplit_0.4.10+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
Files:
 0728f22ee74887c523e4ec3ddd3a8a50 1779 net extra sslsplit_0.4.10+dfsg-1.dsc
 06d4cabaeb0759ecd61bec49cbe586f2 86360 net extra sslsplit_0.4.10+dfsg.orig.tar.bz2
 e4fe4bca8ee6f20ec519078578d1fb02 6648 net extra sslsplit_0.4.10+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz
 1388e58c1d7dd1f6256502b7bfa21186 60466 net extra sslsplit_0.4.10+dfsg-1_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=+PuK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: