Accepted robustbase 0.92-4-1 (source amd64) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 07:02:35 -0500
Source: robustbase
Binary: r-cran-robustbase
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.92-4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
Changed-By: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
Description:
r-cran-robustbase - GNU R package providing basic robust statistics
Changes:
robustbase (0.92-4-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release
.
* debian/control: Set Build-Depends: to current R version
Checksums-Sha1:
c8066df6e07010f24fa609cc974d320be3554412 1705 robustbase_0.92-4-1.dsc
351212541af8eb3703a12335e9192cb87041cf04 3163475 robustbase_0.92-4.orig.tar.gz
e657a2bdbd97b4484003c5c8de04d95694e48b81 3370 robustbase_0.92-4-1.diff.gz
6321c73621a5165932e837e912cdefb641b4212f 2867884 r-cran-robustbase_0.92-4-1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
82aa4633944be312185022522dc944aec343dc565d52162e4f9e7237c7cf6ff2 1705 robustbase_0.92-4-1.dsc
b3a0ade5dd673743099dea5eae161990d6aec736153a12b9940b61e93817df37 3163475 robustbase_0.92-4.orig.tar.gz
996a6c46e37000f575bb37beddb1e35124c2eb864bc4fc56b9debbb8b0ba3bda 3370 robustbase_0.92-4-1.diff.gz
9342ed1ff7b8c9c86c34ae9267da240d149d8cc4c3c9037614ef3f2ba2b2bacb 2867884 r-cran-robustbase_0.92-4-1_amd64.deb
Files:
f071ae4de3317c0d723f25fd8ef87e7c 1705 gnu-r optional robustbase_0.92-4-1.dsc
741ac224929b2887e57b723cbc60b22a 3163475 gnu-r optional robustbase_0.92-4.orig.tar.gz
c73371351f1a5917d5a144ec3271e42e 3370 gnu-r optional robustbase_0.92-4-1.diff.gz
c2571cfddf384aa6752480aff0980117 2867884 gnu-r optional r-cran-robustbase_0.92-4-1_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=91Y1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: