Accepted netplug 1.2.9.2-2 (source i386) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 00:34:05 +0100
Source: netplug
Binary: netplug
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.9.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
Changed-By: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
Description:
netplug - network link monitor daemon
Closes: 652418 690129 702495 730573 753747
Changes:
netplug (1.2.9.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* debian/control:
- New maintainer (Closes: #730573)
- Depend on iproute2 instead of transitional iproute (Closes: #753747)
- Add info about difference between netplugd and ifplugd packages
to package long description (Closes: #690129)
- Fix Standards-Version
* debian/rules:
- Fix missing recommended target
- Fix dpkg-buildflags missing
* Handle ST_DOWNANDOUT state (Closes: #652418)
* Allow to specify custom script file via new param '-s' (Closes: #702495)
Checksums-Sha1:
6bc9d8b054adead15223424677eb5d1e2c7ff466 1692 netplug_1.2.9.2-2.dsc
19dc11c0a316352eac7b65d3f3a0e89833f0e7c4 6520 netplug_1.2.9.2-2.debian.tar.xz
9186e8e4b64111642c3373dac45cf39bfaaf0fc7 20856 netplug_1.2.9.2-2_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
7a1ed58d753da5903dc3306013941f7a2ef057d99453d69676b54ec152a4c4e7 1692 netplug_1.2.9.2-2.dsc
49c10d5bb5dd0eb6e0f9642934fe03cdc3fbab96995955b681e6b0368d6762e2 6520 netplug_1.2.9.2-2.debian.tar.xz
38f93d275ad27bbb5a45b3c0fd2a14983f9a6c0c22c71dcafcd9d368c6b2e8e8 20856 netplug_1.2.9.2-2_i386.deb
Files:
8a14b80266ed2b249ac9f398e37f338b 1692 net optional netplug_1.2.9.2-2.dsc
b639b8784e36eb6bb6ccc0d20e76c94f 6520 net optional netplug_1.2.9.2-2.debian.tar.xz
024d573702a30e3e60782eb9bdf7fa6a 20856 net optional netplug_1.2.9.2-2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=WHpD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: