[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted dnsmasq 2.72-3.1 (source amd64 all) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 16:09:06 +0200
Source: dnsmasq
Binary: dnsmasq dnsmasq-base dnsmasq-utils
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.72-3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Simon Kelley <simon@thekelleys.org.uk>
Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Description:
 dnsmasq    - Small caching DNS proxy and DHCP/TFTP server
 dnsmasq-base - Small caching DNS proxy and DHCP/TFTP server
 dnsmasq-utils - Utilities for manipulating DHCP leases
Closes: 783459
Changes:
 dnsmasq (2.72-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * CVE-2015-3294: denial of service and memory disclosure via malformed
     DNS requests (Closes: #783459)
Checksums-Sha1:
 8045ad6e1e7a5ed62d49e1cdd6d672fac3510f91 1870 dnsmasq_2.72-3.1.dsc
 9d91746819db9cc5be6d38cfaac019ad71282eb3 22564 dnsmasq_2.72-3.1.diff.gz
 442e05be419f6db0eff427d6d148e71e67d13dec 15826 dnsmasq_2.72-3.1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 fb7c4908f74b3b562bd0f8f32dfffb1442bb8b153045d3d097adda00d1b93a85 1870 dnsmasq_2.72-3.1.dsc
 a496547fbee634bbaabc5603085d162c4d1806a4100de17015654320bf0faf29 22564 dnsmasq_2.72-3.1.diff.gz
 23aef43e12dac76aef496b23d8b7adfc601986f5e3e35b9b9f27fe14eec39db0 15826 dnsmasq_2.72-3.1_all.deb
Files:
 6ea739f5671e088b3496716c6b544e21 1870 net optional dnsmasq_2.72-3.1.dsc
 b24cdd4682f8bf674f83df528b86f7b0 22564 net optional dnsmasq_2.72-3.1.diff.gz
 0904344ab96e82e4566ceb79f63096dd 15826 net optional dnsmasq_2.72-3.1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=UGDo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: