Accepted gnome-gmail 1.9-1 (source all) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 10:26:28 -0500
Source: gnome-gmail
Binary: gnome-gmail
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Steele <dsteele@gmail.com>
Changed-By: David Steele <dsteele@gmail.com>
Description:
gnome-gmail - support for Gmail as the preferred email application in GNOME
Changes:
gnome-gmail (1.9-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Multiple user support
* OAuth2 support
* IMAP replaced with GMail API
* Dependencies on GNOME/GTK2 removed
* Configuration moved to .config and keyring OAuth2 schema
* Other misc changes - see package Changelog
Checksums-Sha1:
4b1ebccc703dcafc481eddb01905baaee922cb36 1933 gnome-gmail_1.9-1.dsc
5f5d4a949619d427885db5b5d1f0e1ad6dc9c455 70302 gnome-gmail_1.9.orig.tar.gz
b27c98c9270c5ed56f14ab1c9def997d70c2f8a2 3656 gnome-gmail_1.9-1.debian.tar.xz
ef7163d0356206eef0f1a070161fad7cd64c822b 55284 gnome-gmail_1.9-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
f92e22925fc9ff3df133cf06ac459811ed84c34be53ff39c29f566b156bd47cd 1933 gnome-gmail_1.9-1.dsc
a8b951d7a5193d6fbb1f352dc58008b1deca410b6d86ad56da38c2f1d32e6205 70302 gnome-gmail_1.9.orig.tar.gz
6fe53e635663d310942471fdf7642aca1ac462de18653ce8a8dafecbf49dec79 3656 gnome-gmail_1.9-1.debian.tar.xz
428a659d8520f683493d08d44c60d1743696cec38883eff866a093b7ddb7faeb 55284 gnome-gmail_1.9-1_all.deb
Files:
0b7879c7610b2ccfc240512eb1f353cf 1933 gnome optional gnome-gmail_1.9-1.dsc
3786f2d0dffabcfaa8958bdad6ff3504 70302 gnome optional gnome-gmail_1.9.orig.tar.gz
ec5d5e31c1b13fdde4178e0ead81e702 3656 gnome optional gnome-gmail_1.9-1.debian.tar.xz
dea4d499ace848cb98ea88e0e4955531 55284 gnome optional gnome-gmail_1.9-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=HmQ0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: