Accepted afl 1.70b-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 18:41:07 +0200
Source: afl
Binary: afl
Architecture: source
Version: 1.70b-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
Description:
afl - instrumentation-driven fuzzer for binary formats
Changes:
afl (1.70b-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release:
+ Refactor afl-tmin to reduce the number of execs in common use cases.
+ Add MEM_BARRIER() to afl-showmap and afl-tmin, just to be safe.
+ Remove build date and time from banners to give people deterministic
builds.
+ Fix a minor PRNG glitch that would make the first seconds of a fuzzing
job deterministic.
+ Modify resumption code to reuse the original timeout value when resuming
a session if -t is not given. This prevents timeout creep in continuous
fuzzing.
* Extend the DEP-8 tests.
Checksums-Sha1:
4b8448f58e7664d3f55e7d50e2868b3f550197a0 1708 afl_1.70b-1.dsc
4ccbf059709f306d1003a444018cc2500a877ce1 792536 afl_1.70b.orig.tar.gz
48041580d42ea58a88597b25ea847ececfd7e18d 6671 afl_1.70b-1.debian.tar.gz
Checksums-Sha256:
0c169bb61b92a767d2594bddf72bc32f0802695052ee1c72b37c77dcd0bca82b 1708 afl_1.70b-1.dsc
80ea2dc01148d701e748b1c8832ed4f7025996753fb849c7185023976d60350a 792536 afl_1.70b.orig.tar.gz
ff06eeefce27409a8a647d1fdff01aa5cf229232e964019f38c9056175d9bf3f 6671 afl_1.70b-1.debian.tar.gz
Files:
67c10630f3721d4addf3917a76acd1c5 1708 devel optional afl_1.70b-1.dsc
3075f8c80b507da9c8529500bad4d787 792536 devel optional afl_1.70b.orig.tar.gz
d7c11ed07bf00f2e880f933313750cb9 6671 devel optional afl_1.70b-1.debian.tar.gz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=W7GK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: