[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted checkpw 1.02-1.1 (source amd64) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:49:55 +0100
Source: checkpw
Binary: checkpw
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.02-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Description:
 checkpw    - checks password which is stored in ~/Maildir/.password
Closes: 780139
Changes:
 checkpw (1.02-1.1) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * CVE-2015-0885: Fix denial of service via -- in usernames (Closes: #780139)
Checksums-Sha1:
 3f16c419ac695ee7a9f76ba8b852217ccbaa2bf5 1577 checkpw_1.02-1.1.dsc
 d726f5236c78f409871ee0a69c1757a8fe657cef 6734 checkpw_1.02-1.1.diff.gz
Checksums-Sha256:
 c1510f983cec024f2d5bfe834989e9e72c6093acc69657be2adf38f2ba9cb6c8 1577 checkpw_1.02-1.1.dsc
 ae4162bf3d480c4ee7f6bee5a02e3d8425292e378587f95444c8b2c4644a6056 6734 checkpw_1.02-1.1.diff.gz
Files:
 6310032aa5b7d5e05606f508f6adc31a 1577 mail optional checkpw_1.02-1.1.dsc
 6bee4d5ad3625fcecfee3600877440c2 6734 mail optional checkpw_1.02-1.1.diff.gz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=pbuF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: