Accepted u-boot 2014.10+dfsg1-3 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 13:13:31 -0800
Source: u-boot
Binary: u-boot u-boot-imx u-boot-omap u-boot-sunxi u-boot-exynos u-boot-tools
Architecture: source
Version: 2014.10+dfsg1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>
Changed-By: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>
Description:
u-boot - A boot loader for embedded systems
u-boot-exynos - A boot loader for exynos systems
u-boot-imx - A boot loader for imx systems
u-boot-omap - A boot loader for omap systems
u-boot-sunxi - A boot loader for sunxi systems
u-boot-tools - companion tools for Das U-Boot bootloader
Closes: 777466 777518
Changes:
u-boot (2014.10+dfsg1-3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* cubox-i-support.diff: Refresh patch, dropping solidrun.bmp, which
causes FTBFS with newer version of patch (Closes: #777518).
.
* Add patch to support A20-OLinuXino-LIME2, backported from u-boot
2015.01. Thanks to Karsten Merker for the patch (Closes: #777466).
Checksums-Sha1:
337b344d484db320e4f1c64e8feadd9ef207f5c8 2299 u-boot_2014.10+dfsg1-3.dsc
036595d5408922b6031c9d304887322e67d0a3a2 47232 u-boot_2014.10+dfsg1-3.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
fc27f6526ea14bba9bb69d2637ea41de1ebb31f8651d1a36fe97478b1d6ae03e 2299 u-boot_2014.10+dfsg1-3.dsc
6d4336844e0dbab6ab2bb88996b46ca6215e003a0db46628a1cdd2fcbbb451e4 47232 u-boot_2014.10+dfsg1-3.debian.tar.xz
Files:
b6d6a5621503d9327796686dea534110 2299 admin optional u-boot_2014.10+dfsg1-3.dsc
6f594ecd69ace82c0e367cfc08fb424b 47232 admin optional u-boot_2014.10+dfsg1-3.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=bfJb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: