Accepted pmailq 0.5-2 (source all) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 07:25:34 +0100
Source: pmailq
Binary: pmailq
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Emmanuel Bouthenot <kolter@debian.org>
Changed-By: Emmanuel Bouthenot <kolter@debian.org>
Description:
pmailq - postfix mail queue manager
Changes:
pmailq (0.5-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Add a patch to fix the delete command
Checksums-Sha1:
06075779aebb76561c799435a4f49e53e0ec6f0d 1780 pmailq_0.5-2.dsc
8f8c5ad9e25a0341f1f1b3f49995939f36f8fc8d 2456 pmailq_0.5-2.debian.tar.xz
2cd1bf24dfc87d45dfe9b2f0cc6e28cfed89ecca 8748 pmailq_0.5-2_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
3da4c00c7c822b64beb9bf22a7334efddf204f30af1c1691955e4bef5290a8d4 1780 pmailq_0.5-2.dsc
4cd3dc71591757a29d79404b4c643c3e62a5d3fd6da111a68881bc6abbbaca6e 2456 pmailq_0.5-2.debian.tar.xz
2c02659ff0ccc26115b1995761d5c7af091d052a85ae0d928c66f57459e877e2 8748 pmailq_0.5-2_all.deb
Files:
f16a15a0b3353d8a948ab106754cd350 1780 admin extra pmailq_0.5-2.dsc
9e4578cc9b2cdcdc342e09dec8763bb6 2456 admin extra pmailq_0.5-2.debian.tar.xz
f89384505f609d49d0037dc975c0c011 8748 admin extra pmailq_0.5-2_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=VKdq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: