[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted heirloom-mailx 12.5-3.1 (source amd64) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 06:55:53 +0100
Source: heirloom-mailx
Binary: heirloom-mailx
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 12.5-3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Hilko Bengen <bengen@debian.org>
Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Description:
 heirloom-mailx - feature-rich BSD mail(1)
Closes: 773417
Changes:
 heirloom-mailx (12.5-3.1) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Apply patches from Red Hat (Florian Weimer) to address command
     execution issues (Closes: #773417):
     + 0011-outof-Introduce-expandaddr-flag.patch
       Disable command execution in email addresses (CVE-2014-7844)
     + 0012-unpack-Disable-option-processing-for-email-addresses.patch
     + 0013-fio.c-Unconditionally-require-wordexp-support.patch
     + 0014-globname-Invoke-wordexp-with-WRDE_NOCMD.patch (CVE-2004-2771)
Checksums-Sha1:
 c9574b4848753333856f81d67802f295d58c91fd 1791 heirloom-mailx_12.5-3.1.dsc
 1cffeed1f2ad9b0253a9f619e2a6f9fb8e3e0aba 9068 heirloom-mailx_12.5-3.1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 cfd2dda2d7f1d4a9c855393e4a7e4ece73bad6768108a6cb33126d6161292c1f 1791 heirloom-mailx_12.5-3.1.dsc
 62b73665c1d2815e483df76be116b00e20e2e60c6dc5178542ef13d1ddfc3c68 9068 heirloom-mailx_12.5-3.1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 61886120ea0d22384dc0536794ffaf54 1791 mail optional heirloom-mailx_12.5-3.1.dsc
 bc9591c97242d4a95c26a3bea61df969 9068 mail optional heirloom-mailx_12.5-3.1.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=jAZi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: