Accepted afl 0.90b-1 (source) into experimental
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:56:54 +0100
Source: afl
Binary: afl
Architecture: source
Version: 0.90b-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
Changed-By: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
Description:
afl - instrumentation-driven fuzzer for binary formats
Changes:
afl (0.90b-1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release:
+ Move to an algorithm where paths are selected as preferred primarily
based on size and speed, rather than bitmap coverage. This should offer
noticeable performance gains in many use cases.
+ Refactor path calibration code; calibration now takes place as soon as
a test case is discovered, to facilitate better prioritization decisions
later on.
+ Change the way of marking variable paths to avoid .state metadata
inconsistencies.
+ Make sure that calibration routines always create a new test case to
avoid hypothetical problems with utilities that modify the input file.
+ Add bitmap saturation to fuzzer stats and plot data.
* Remove an accidentally included, unused patch.
Checksums-Sha1:
fb6a428211d8c5c39681e675ead0ab4c82b48799 1708 afl_0.90b-1.dsc
1430dc4cc9e3b3f9a46cb4c3e57bf9da3477ac4c 697960 afl_0.90b.orig.tar.gz
144777e03fba342ef1976cb44f48971a4f6030e3 2983 afl_0.90b-1.debian.tar.gz
Checksums-Sha256:
ec590ef672a867b77bf094faca3d11baf4176daa04e6d2d9cfddcb74914787b2 1708 afl_0.90b-1.dsc
bf5fcb36e6403f8cbbc3c816901c3e8d57768c99cd8bcf989ac2e02b87d40540 697960 afl_0.90b.orig.tar.gz
977308505310cea0b1e83fe669d31aaf94df9b6cbb1cde1d7894b3572eae493a 2983 afl_0.90b-1.debian.tar.gz
Files:
5ffe19de39e7bca78e1531bfde04be43 1708 devel optional afl_0.90b-1.dsc
c0602005c8dbaf2eb5efc4e31165575f 697960 devel optional afl_0.90b.orig.tar.gz
3cf0cab11e912fbd05a6d3f0fe4348fa 2983 devel optional afl_0.90b-1.debian.tar.gz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=bNqk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: