[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted ruby-sprockets 2.12.3-1 (source all) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 16:29:03 -0200
Source: ruby-sprockets
Binary: ruby-sprockets
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.12.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers <pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>
Description:
 ruby-sprockets - Rack-based asset packaging system
Changes:
 ruby-sprockets (2.12.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release
     - Fix for [CVE-2014-7819] Arbitrary file existence disclosure in
       Sprockets
Checksums-Sha1:
 3b4c566f986b46d746e9b60b1a34e140cf6d2172 2153 ruby-sprockets_2.12.3-1.dsc
 e291238605246568efce415e9153f46fccb86bed 39719 ruby-sprockets_2.12.3.orig.tar.gz
 da8185d97cdc3b69f6418aca59cdbaa37ee77515 4128 ruby-sprockets_2.12.3-1.debian.tar.xz
 638dd66d47da561120545731dd5f5557ae50f96b 39978 ruby-sprockets_2.12.3-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 e8116330f9e31a820e129e4a89a87a8050f08b00031e54567f2c615e53424a32 2153 ruby-sprockets_2.12.3-1.dsc
 ea645e2bbb04385dc3c19da956d3b6f561494d8d2e90a6f8c66aa7667b5da331 39719 ruby-sprockets_2.12.3.orig.tar.gz
 ff9d02b81ebd39fdebff538f92aabf634e73a67c53ce58f6695fdd9abad4b912 4128 ruby-sprockets_2.12.3-1.debian.tar.xz
 d1436a797b04d05d41faa7f114b95731b2ea83da405771b7f96d9aa849f89834 39978 ruby-sprockets_2.12.3-1_all.deb
Files:
 b1994d73b8fb57b8e8da96b92dd7c768 2153 ruby optional ruby-sprockets_2.12.3-1.dsc
 62cd88f873d0abfe39b822088518fed7 39719 ruby optional ruby-sprockets_2.12.3.orig.tar.gz
 b6edc869e4b535c103079b2aa48b5d82 4128 ruby optional ruby-sprockets_2.12.3-1.debian.tar.xz
 d289684e6b60ec09bf76d88fec33e336 39978 ruby optional ruby-sprockets_2.12.3-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=v+zW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: