[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted base-files 7.9 (source amd64) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:33:22 +0100
Source: base-files
Binary: base-files
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 7.9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>
Changed-By: Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>
Description:
 base-files - Debian base system miscellaneous files
Changes:
 base-files (7.9) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * The change introduced in version 7.7 regarding /mnt seems to break
     the ability of debootstrap currently in wheezy to create a sid chroot.
     The case of initial install of /mnt is already handled by postinst line
     "install_directory mnt 755 root" inside the big "if" block that
     creates a bunch of other things, so we can restrict re-creating the /mnt
     directory on upgrades to the case when we are really upgrading.
     Therefore, the code is moved to the same "if" block where /etc/profile
     and /etc/nsswitch.conf are upgraded to their new defaults when unchanged.
     This might help as a workaround for Bug#766459.
Checksums-Sha1:
 dce75e12b3465f20ef9da859f9c3c10de685d97d 1006 base-files_7.9.dsc
 78cfba925e52386c8f86803cc66814a792224fd0 52788 base-files_7.9.tar.xz
 aa3e839f3e91b962293e25cdedf31198cf92d31f 77612 base-files_7.9_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 0b77afef7ef82bba4ae55c07e4640547cfa0ad645afccdffd127cabfa25fae5a 1006 base-files_7.9.dsc
 f9bd88c94ae8ebd8ae5bd4cf63772983a4f966767e8a391207c4e4e606baba17 52788 base-files_7.9.tar.xz
 0a6b529e8b821545489d83465dede6b41f8569de8fc889b2d96a0721c50f93bc 77612 base-files_7.9_amd64.deb
Files:
 05c8075a12000025f3841d231e5c6fb2 1006 admin required base-files_7.9.dsc
 31383609d1cd36249799f5d686069c1f 52788 admin required base-files_7.9.tar.xz
 63afd9d50dd05aedb108e157a6403e0d 77612 admin required base-files_7.9_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUTi6AAAoJEEHOfwufG4syq/gH/RMbrfhT/R2d238IsLb9Gp02
JZxxf0u4M9jKe4Kpj23JyRW8C9iu9O1SOykzqjtMYF1aHcIKN9h66/gBM2lYxcHh
edgICFb6bI1EG3zoF3X9VUCl1BQFpgTFyFz3KykSm/VU5BIB1CBqLu+rL+1UfhTQ
fKBWn48Mbq6qF7dmhpf6IvYd9C08lUezm9v433G4/oqpCFs9X5lIuOoty6eDdHan
eu40mt4PlS9jEk3/MRSkykPgIdZQ7ueLpspqOJmG3gm6hD8Q7hQ+AxuedU8lMQSY
qVwkr7qdFSMBMy9t0I7j7HwtPkIFYxyx6eCLL2dubWuQa2ZAGeXJ//yuzYp1w50=
=pRbN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: