Accepted r-cran-rcurl 1.95-4.3-1 (source amd64) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 12:19:23 +0200
Source: r-cran-rcurl
Binary: r-cran-rcurl
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.95-4.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Med Packaging Team <debian-med-packaging@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>
Description:
r-cran-rcurl - GNU R General network (HTTP/FTP/...) client interface
Changes:
r-cran-rcurl (1.95-4.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream version
* Provide some manual test script (requiring online access and thus
can not tested in a minimal chroot)
* cme fix dpkg-control
* revised d/copyright regarding lintian warnings
Checksums-Sha1:
8193910ec1fd10b8c154b9e38256023bf97f2c27 2164 r-cran-rcurl_1.95-4.3-1.dsc
b6935e41126edae730ed9cc52f2e673473138690 879143 r-cran-rcurl_1.95-4.3.orig.tar.gz
77b72637383aea45360b44762381d86a39a815d2 19776 r-cran-rcurl_1.95-4.3-1.debian.tar.xz
b7ede035b43d1c638c82e49755eaaeea26f8cc19 527298 r-cran-rcurl_1.95-4.3-1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
2d6bac219b85571cfa377b3ff1db6fc752a8c3a65a8b39f8235e00353f87cad2 2164 r-cran-rcurl_1.95-4.3-1.dsc
cf791471a88ba6ed02cdf043ed8fded918aa8ca609f31dea6d747cde6d56d2bf 879143 r-cran-rcurl_1.95-4.3.orig.tar.gz
6767a54c50caca235c87efdf0a337c2bad77fce95151ec5f35b1d9df1d6e5b1b 19776 r-cran-rcurl_1.95-4.3-1.debian.tar.xz
9fb18c63d881d761497cc3186b7f92640e9205c4334e165ccc75633b123b8f40 527298 r-cran-rcurl_1.95-4.3-1_amd64.deb
Files:
9205a8373f9557c7db8a1d0838dd5576 527298 gnu-r optional r-cran-rcurl_1.95-4.3-1_amd64.deb
052413eca923e5456834365911aca925 2164 gnu-r optional r-cran-rcurl_1.95-4.3-1.dsc
dc8f93b609f2216d2cc584d50dbcb062 879143 gnu-r optional r-cran-rcurl_1.95-4.3.orig.tar.gz
6696dbea487db232e3ec79f173a8c9aa 19776 gnu-r optional r-cran-rcurl_1.95-4.3-1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=rlV7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: