[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted arpack++ 2.3-3 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:37:45 +0200
Source: arpack++
Binary: libarpack++2-dev libarpack++2c2a
Architecture: source
Version: 2.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Team <debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Anton Gladky <gladk@debian.org>
Description:
 libarpack++2-dev - Object-oriented version of the ARPACK package (development)
 libarpack++2c2a - Object-oriented version of the ARPACK package (runtime)
Closes: 684805 702546 713300 726568
Changes:
 arpack++ (2.3-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Sylvestre Ledru ]
   * Team upload
   * Standards-Version updated to 3.9.5
   * Fix the URL (Closes: #702546)
   * libarpack++2-dev recommends libsuperlu3-dev (Closes: #726568)
   * Fix 'gcc-4.7 build errors (missing this pointers)' (Closes: #684805)
 .
   [ Daniel T Chen ]
   * [89a7d41] Use dh-autoreconf. (Closes: #713300)
 .
   [ Anton Gladky ]
   * [e72ea5e] Set build-flags using dpkg-buildflags.
   * [33978b1] Set compat 9.
   * [22174c7] Add myself to uploaders.
   * [7a88366] Use wrap-and-sort.
   * [c1848c7] Switch VCS to git.
Checksums-Sha1:
 70ac2f69549197401f12d8f16bfa1ededef587f0 2149 arpack++_2.3-3.dsc
 62bfc3221b235de1f06f12c297cbec1bdde945db 12564 arpack++_2.3-3.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 0839213d7c0f9879c4b19d07f467f40b4d96461d154181f5ae3bfa68068fcf77 2149 arpack++_2.3-3.dsc
 11fa2752fdcab887061c25c176d804583353f02626d92f3684b828cfd2ae6447 12564 arpack++_2.3-3.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 298846429c4cea28d15c8f9efcd90db4 2149 devel optional arpack++_2.3-3.dsc
 c03ecdc469fdd326078e956d5a97b79d 12564 devel optional arpack++_2.3-3.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=Y9LD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: