[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted rcmdr 2.1-1-1 (source i386) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:54:38 -0500
Source: rcmdr
Binary: r-cran-rcmdr
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1-1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
Changed-By: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
Description:
 r-cran-rcmdr - GNU R platform-independent basic-statistics GUI
Changes:
 rcmdr (2.1-1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release
 .
   * The package has new Build-Depends "markdown, knitr" which are not
     currently satisfiable within Debian, so the package was again lightly
     patched in three lines of R code to test for the package and suggest
     manual installation
 .
   * debian/control: Added Build-Depends: on r-cran-rcmdrmisc
Checksums-Sha1:
 c55a3b940afc695b39e5c57beb6eb38bc90395fb 1766 rcmdr_2.1-1-1.dsc
 450ccef1931f3bb0dc2425f8f04c0b56d7df7ff3 4956722 rcmdr_2.1-1.orig.tar.gz
 9d927ede703ccdf61ff44f1dad0b3550c85fdce8 7489 rcmdr_2.1-1-1.diff.gz
 1ab39b071c2b9dbb342e47811bfdc42a5770967e 5056624 r-cran-rcmdr_2.1-1-1_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 8bd9750fc389ade54f7d3d4885be0bfc973f1a91fb535e1166f9e2bfe5fbeb21 1766 rcmdr_2.1-1-1.dsc
 e2105a0181db2e64945b675aca70cf7ac8a6e385c91856bc39767815b1174892 4956722 rcmdr_2.1-1.orig.tar.gz
 ba17362067b4ef4f4f73b4d5a948f98d116369652494203cdc0ed698454b6eac 7489 rcmdr_2.1-1-1.diff.gz
 e196118a1700abc0eb15d50bcaa339bff0b4fe8c7ea68552edba7db3d3bed22a 5056624 r-cran-rcmdr_2.1-1-1_i386.deb
Files:
 33b5e56136e3f9c774baefe5d12e779f 5056624 gnu-r optional r-cran-rcmdr_2.1-1-1_i386.deb
 b2c580969334044d1b48d8dea33b7f77 1766 gnu-r optional rcmdr_2.1-1-1.dsc
 aaf4fc15ab04de646131dd78ee09158d 4956722 gnu-r optional rcmdr_2.1-1.orig.tar.gz
 7b6fd5e45994a5a084610f11e6a70c78 7489 gnu-r optional rcmdr_2.1-1-1.diff.gz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=cWw7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: