[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted ha 0.999p+dfsg-5 (source amd64) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 14:11:19 +0200
Source: ha
Binary: ha
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.999p+dfsg-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mikhail Gusarov <dottedmag@debian.org>
Changed-By: Mikhail Gusarov <dottedmag@debian.org>
Description:
 ha         - archiver for .ha files
Closes: 688283
Changes:
 ha (0.999p+dfsg-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Updated debhelper compatibility to level 9 to get hardening support.
     Dropped hardening-wrapper.
   * Using simple $(CC) invocation instead of broken upstream makefile.
   * Add Vcs-Git/Vcs-Browser fields.
   * Updated Standards-Version to 3.9.5, no changes needed.
   * debian/patches/fix-read-string-realloc.patch: Fixed crash
     reading long filenames from archive (Closes: #688283)
Checksums-Sha1:
 e2a77711157ad559f13e291bf303cd248e85ccb6 1779 ha_0.999p+dfsg-5.dsc
 1615325f818c60e9720d41d219cfdd47c196152b 4556 ha_0.999p+dfsg-5.debian.tar.xz
 8641437339b43ce335f221dd80b8888990953331 32838 ha_0.999p+dfsg-5_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 a2568d7c127aa9017be7aae009c0bef1e5ba9fdadbaa6bc8bb72144bce75708f 1779 ha_0.999p+dfsg-5.dsc
 88a4cbd27973c3ac7f9d619e4754cc339d892e3de0ff8482e883655315ca8089 4556 ha_0.999p+dfsg-5.debian.tar.xz
 a7e1ab3613e32c0eb82727a3e6231b8be8a3e97a3b7f7b0ffd9ff3fcc3876834 32838 ha_0.999p+dfsg-5_amd64.deb
Files:
 aa8096c8ca1c9f8d8eb24ba53fe427cc 32838 utils optional ha_0.999p+dfsg-5_amd64.deb
 d04d4d854dd62942c9039b409ff290f4 1779 utils optional ha_0.999p+dfsg-5.dsc
 2af9a1d977c51788915afeb3d131b6f5 4556 utils optional ha_0.999p+dfsg-5.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
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=0cfI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: