Accepted wmbiff 0.4.27-2.2 (source i386) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 15:08:24 +0200
Source: wmbiff
Binary: wmbiff
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.27-2.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Neil Spring <nspring@cs.washington.edu>
Changed-By: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@debian.org>
Description:
wmbiff - A dockable app that displays information about mailboxes
Closes: 624083 638736
Changes:
wmbiff (0.4.27-2.2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Switch to quilt v3 format.
* 15_no_more_LZO.diff: Stop trying to use gnutls LZO compression, which was
removed upstream. Closes: #638736
* 16_gnutls_deprecated.diff: Pull parts of
4e9e018b2236e00aa591f1d5d99ec59f74475480 from upstream GIT, use
gnutls_certificate_verify_peers2() instead of
gnutls_certificate_verify_peers(). Closes: #624083
* 10_use_pkg-config.diff/11_autoconfgenchanges.diff:
gnutls_certificate_verify_peers2() was added in gnutls 1.2.0, check for
this version in ./configure.
* Build against libgnutls28-dev/libgcrypt20-dev.
Checksums-Sha1:
e5058ffbacc1b2c9bf5f2aadf4e6ae49a4ae5141 1791 wmbiff_0.4.27-2.2.dsc
c0b309f5f6efe8e2e39bfc98b1227c1de75bccba 63708 wmbiff_0.4.27-2.2.debian.tar.xz
bfab9df9b4059f612939bde075a904a2a19360a6 94956 wmbiff_0.4.27-2.2_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
f7bdc9376e624c72c772a6be786347a8fae93bf22da6bebe9fcd4c44082a7028 1791 wmbiff_0.4.27-2.2.dsc
41445a7306cd6bf5c4c65b8a56a2cd6b1d3ee8e87de4696043ece94a8faad28b 63708 wmbiff_0.4.27-2.2.debian.tar.xz
a0a009662cf4bbfe6ff2edc162c5a7721ebf280ae85a6f48bc85008a78bb443d 94956 wmbiff_0.4.27-2.2_i386.deb
Files:
08eef8c60c43fedefd41caba965fc028 94956 x11 optional wmbiff_0.4.27-2.2_i386.deb
583b2ac8105f0e51465da195d97c1bb1 1791 x11 optional wmbiff_0.4.27-2.2.dsc
8ed0c0a2631accf37b3dd991a7ae0e19 63708 x11 optional wmbiff_0.4.27-2.2.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=3jQD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: