Accepted debci 0.8.1 (source all) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:25:23 -0300
Source: debci
Binary: debci
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>
Changed-By: Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>
Description:
debci - continuous integration system for Debian
Changes:
debci (0.8.1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Documentation updates
* Fix obtaining the finish date of tests. Parsing the adt-run log started
producing bad dates when adt-run changed to displaying only the time
without the date. debci now uses the timestamp of when adt-run finished
instead.
* debci-batch: store offline mark in persistent storage to avoid going back
online after a reboot.
* debci-test: revert to updating only package-specific data; it turns out
that updating global data after every package is too expensive.
* debci-batch: update global data every 1 hour or so
* debci-generate-index: avoid crash when regenerating data for extenal
consumption from scratch. This process is not completely idempotent yet,
so it needs more work.
Checksums-Sha1:
11ea7ed7835124bf4f06133f0fdba6f74073dd9d 1665 debci_0.8.1.dsc
62cdb065129072b0e11d571767fd6f9941b89493 146460 debci_0.8.1.tar.xz
56bfc6cc8537dd3f4891464383aa0928d6b9abfa 162596 debci_0.8.1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
f3e18c0168511f7e0bd86d6718b46bf491cc15c7160bc871891cbd46ef96a5c4 1665 debci_0.8.1.dsc
25400f8698780180dee4a062cb62ef9dc4188210bdcbc823cb093688b1073811 146460 debci_0.8.1.tar.xz
342ba271e7916643767c4e5fe5a2b0fd8a3160e932abffccba57cef95a43ce3e 162596 debci_0.8.1_all.deb
Files:
6bded2248e54bc74d2edddaa9b3e13cf 162596 devel optional debci_0.8.1_all.deb
390aeb6638b89de6119e52ee93a3c6ce 1665 devel optional debci_0.8.1.dsc
a0b7dd10d05bd55a08e0ca8ae5a59d84 146460 devel optional debci_0.8.1.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=yYbP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: