Accepted nfs-utils 1:1.2.8-9 (source amd64) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 17:12:38 -0700
Source: nfs-utils
Binary: nfs-kernel-server nfs-common
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:1.2.8-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian kernel team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
Description:
nfs-common - NFS support files common to client and server
nfs-kernel-server - support for NFS kernel server
Closes: 757835
Changes:
nfs-utils (1:1.2.8-9) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* debian/patches/22-mountd-fix-segfault-in-add_name-with-newer-gcc-
compi.patch: cherry-pick fix from upstream for a segfault in
add_name with newer gcc compilers. Closes: #757835, LP: #1355829.
Checksums-Sha1:
1a9ed05cb2930ec57669610ece7965c0751d2572 2257 nfs-utils_1.2.8-9.dsc
242da06d0c1e038e46fdb35fd3c57b12870f338e 40171 nfs-utils_1.2.8-9.debian.tar.bz2
9127bec47a9555445ca536102dcd3c2862de8d26 114774 nfs-kernel-server_1.2.8-9_amd64.deb
7bc2bcdd50df41937f3208cb76c917b9d5dd0eec 205588 nfs-common_1.2.8-9_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
097a0c817a8018b485b8218fac943c711e05165cd530d52a554c723dd9963840 2257 nfs-utils_1.2.8-9.dsc
ed30d32760d26afa01a4affce25d3834c4c2364f2a5262680a9805ea78833aec 40171 nfs-utils_1.2.8-9.debian.tar.bz2
cd8c9d733d8519b909aa7e1b9b7206019ad2772a89a4465995f9bb1d97bcd2a4 114774 nfs-kernel-server_1.2.8-9_amd64.deb
8a70040382b5eb0b9488667c73e8f9e88ce242d739529cfc292dcd8c01d81b1d 205588 nfs-common_1.2.8-9_amd64.deb
Files:
cf903f869a976c1b42be0ed9b0dea1c5 114774 net optional nfs-kernel-server_1.2.8-9_amd64.deb
c667388ed766fe79b06f12152491b567 205588 net standard nfs-common_1.2.8-9_amd64.deb
3f510304d1b36d2cb6ef3a8eabab3a62 2257 net standard nfs-utils_1.2.8-9.dsc
3f18f3ffd5209e91e8a483d82c9cb369 40171 net standard nfs-utils_1.2.8-9.debian.tar.bz2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=S3TS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: