[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted 389-console 1.1.7-2 (source all) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 12:34:57 +0300
Source: 389-console
Binary: 389-console
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.7-2
Distribution: sid
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Timo Aaltonen <tjaalton@ubuntu.com>
Changed-By: Timo Aaltonen <tjaalton@debian.org>
Description:
 389-console - 389 Management Console
Changes:
 389-console (1.1.7-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * watch: Add a comment about the upstream git tree.
   * control: Update my email.
   * control: Bump policy to 3.9.5, no changes.
   * control: Bump debhelper compat to 9.
   * control: Drop dependency on java runtime.
   * control: Use canonical vcs urls.
Checksums-Sha1:
 b3283190716d1309caba73ab2b9c50584d9983af 2021 389-console_1.1.7-2.dsc
 87ae48c131b2964f9dac97e011a8a8fb61d3a8a4 112970 389-console_1.1.7.orig.tar.bz2
 9a2ae3a6cfb863d2a9dacd2234af8627e811a0a4 2136 389-console_1.1.7-2.debian.tar.xz
 23a0039d4b11aa1a1e830b7aa0f20cbc34758d25 63506 389-console_1.1.7-2_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 89a3c8f165cb9dea0fa9b04d8f895829473aa406f48e7ee1362855d94b25ba66 2021 389-console_1.1.7-2.dsc
 dcaf63654ec4c6986b9a3b10d79d8e0592f334fd42d34869b0b767bbffd01a05 112970 389-console_1.1.7.orig.tar.bz2
 c375326d3ac5910840904942ce2d33bc74cbf53f2e13e40b0f5ba323a9e3cd45 2136 389-console_1.1.7-2.debian.tar.xz
 bf5011aa43efd258ac125218545e8a065eba47fe4bb92820e3b0babaacb3ed4b 63506 389-console_1.1.7-2_all.deb
Files:
 fc44df8f11a38bde1b5131af87a95e3c 63506 java extra 389-console_1.1.7-2_all.deb
 4de744c6e075532ef726fa849d1fb20f 2021 java extra 389-console_1.1.7-2.dsc
 e2c92a908c633fffe79de8add27906c6 112970 java extra 389-console_1.1.7.orig.tar.bz2
 a6f8d91c2bd9fda798fc67b9e6bebd06 2136 java extra 389-console_1.1.7-2.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=QM6w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: