Accepted gpg-remailer 3.00.01-1 (source amd64)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:47:11 -0800
Source: gpg-remailer
Binary: gpg-remailer
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.00.01-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Frank B. Brokken <f.b.brokken@rug.nl>
Changed-By: tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org>
Description:
gpg-remailer - Forwards re-encrypted PGP/GPG mail to a group
Changes:
gpg-remailer (3.00.01-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Frank B. Brokken ]
* Upstream added option --umask, and repaired a flaw in the program's
exception handling. Version 3.00.00 is not separately released.
.
[ tony mancill ]
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.5 (no changes).
Checksums-Sha1:
ab43ab0849258af58912c7185b8eb9d0fc4ba757 2088 gpg-remailer_3.00.01-1.dsc
65204326d21a970bb4e08b8246e83e738c3e2099 49297 gpg-remailer_3.00.01.orig.tar.gz
2543b6ab5bc84bbf270adab8526988d443da901e 3698 gpg-remailer_3.00.01-1.debian.tar.gz
085237c15cd9b7a3a38eec0ea04f67607f35d33d 63376 gpg-remailer_3.00.01-1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
4c96626e78a0bd50a8d324693386ccd678b68856ffbdd70bfe6c50953bf22200 2088 gpg-remailer_3.00.01-1.dsc
24a7b9bd635965fa20fa2f48fd181860bd3641c4b278f7285aef97f1658f4655 49297 gpg-remailer_3.00.01.orig.tar.gz
9d917921795836aa8ea8e742f168ef9406d1111709e4382d2afb922dc036f86c 3698 gpg-remailer_3.00.01-1.debian.tar.gz
74c386ca55d5e13feeb5f81c2caa10f72c157558bcb979791c9dc4df4d3916c6 63376 gpg-remailer_3.00.01-1_amd64.deb
Files:
238f8b29b42efbbcbd9b505a1f3f8cdd 2088 devel optional gpg-remailer_3.00.01-1.dsc
a170820fd7614a8c55cc85cd39f2251c 49297 devel optional gpg-remailer_3.00.01.orig.tar.gz
afd962638141f06a28debcaa2be3e8cc 3698 devel optional gpg-remailer_3.00.01-1.debian.tar.gz
420737c37461b590bda63bbcd77ec271 63376 devel optional gpg-remailer_3.00.01-1_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)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=e8oB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: