[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted netexpect 0.21-2 (source i386)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 22:15:00 -0400
Source: netexpect
Binary: netexpect tgn
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.21-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Eloy Paris <peloy@debian.org>
Changed-By: Eloy Paris <peloy@debian.org>
Description: 
 netexpect  - Network Expect, a framework for manipulating network packets
 tgn        - A command-line based network traffic generator
Closes: 725072
Changes: 
 netexpect (0.21-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Invoke configure with the correct arguments for --with-tcl and
     --with-tcl-includes (making no assumption that the tcl-dev
     package is version 8.5) (Closes: #725072).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 d46be680cff5dce70c1b9a9d1ea0ee8e3365e073 1241 netexpect_0.21-2.dsc
 0aa96478da87d12d7c98acb307c1c32fbae4551c 19174 netexpect_0.21-2.debian.tar.gz
 bc251efd4c109170150ea7ebe5f25a88f2c59479 125534 netexpect_0.21-2_i386.deb
 460f1be40cf854a021d013ce60525eb545945755 57238 tgn_0.21-2_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 1a7b38831c139d1df55433e935bf5ec58d1bdb2e5d04c1129fac5d0a9f814fc1 1241 netexpect_0.21-2.dsc
 b557109459027a5da6b3fdd9536229e82f0f2bbe8c875ec7eebae6d9e1da9ba2 19174 netexpect_0.21-2.debian.tar.gz
 c1bcf5e204fa0a7fab2c379df94ef2b6c6b065ad2b427ee8afdb368ab62f3917 125534 netexpect_0.21-2_i386.deb
 7b1349858447649409d65000ab05901734af05cb5dced1c1cb6e241fafe943cc 57238 tgn_0.21-2_i386.deb
Files: 
 eee292c30e4ac269af71d04260f949a1 1241 net optional netexpect_0.21-2.dsc
 1320abef9d2d9d7c89206b53ec23d9f0 19174 net optional netexpect_0.21-2.debian.tar.gz
 16098b12c490eacf562d18dc0bcb2263 125534 net optional netexpect_0.21-2_i386.deb
 ee732b80b60dc0ecfc424c9e56fe520e 57238 net optional tgn_0.21-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlJcrBEACgkQagjTfAtNY9iOZQCfR4ybot0crsBMBdVxDjqM0ivG
mfoAoIssM0uvrJFUoaEgMD81sJ9EMZgR
=0FD8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: