[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted adblock-plus 2.2.4-1 (source all)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 13:02:09 +0200
Source: adblock-plus
Binary: xul-ext-adblock-plus
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dmitry E. Oboukhov <unera@debian.org>
Changed-By: Benjamin Drung <bdrung@debian.org>
Description: 
 xul-ext-adblock-plus - Advertisement blocking extension for web browsers
Changes: 
 adblock-plus (2.2.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 a919bad7701f69cb4416e693d799dc1e46e3d5bd 2152 adblock-plus_2.2.4-1.dsc
 65bc3451ffef8f6074afe3abd72e29db175d1576 696971 adblock-plus_2.2.4.orig.tar.gz
 78dd5fd4f057271cea65dacbf1b2f2ed599e6f88 6713 adblock-plus_2.2.4-1.debian.tar.gz
 d0dec2bfdf45241aa708c59ba58f314991bca729 627874 xul-ext-adblock-plus_2.2.4-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 e43568a4eae21a4ceef1113dcf784e4e0780e715c262ccd74a98899e2d73de2f 2152 adblock-plus_2.2.4-1.dsc
 d22e1dca86fa01e2e993e52a2f9b8ad8b3103cb2f9d59d6b81cc5937fe88f435 696971 adblock-plus_2.2.4.orig.tar.gz
 8170d492f7a575ccb14c1cb0e03247d694bc17b6cc2d1296deefde90865c8735 6713 adblock-plus_2.2.4-1.debian.tar.gz
 928b7937f3115705f5f92bcd2482811b3a756650d095b8eb871142065b0888cc 627874 xul-ext-adblock-plus_2.2.4-1_all.deb
Files: 
 e9c431bcce394755da1156e757850459 2152 web optional adblock-plus_2.2.4-1.dsc
 b04667b1627bf6e8157d60ab1c0637dc 696971 web optional adblock-plus_2.2.4.orig.tar.gz
 a0da1d26ced9670054201b6e62eac0b8 6713 web optional adblock-plus_2.2.4-1.debian.tar.gz
 90755542b4ba45c672155facd5f940f2 627874 web optional xul-ext-adblock-plus_2.2.4-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=r6vv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: