Accepted node 0.3.2-7.2 (source amd64 all)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 00:37:37 +0100
Source: node
Binary: ax25-node node
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 0.3.2-7.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Hamradio Maintainers <debian-hams@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Steve McIntyre <93sam@debian.org>
Description:
ax25-node - Amateur Packet Radio Node program
node - Amateur Packet Radio Node program (transitional package)
Closes: 681361
Changes:
node (0.3.2-7.2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* NMU
* Implement the tech committee decision to fix the node/nodejs name
clash (Closes: #681361):
+ Rename the existing "node" binary package to "ax25-node"
+ Rename the /usr/sbin/node binary in that package to
/usr/sbin/ax25-node
+ Add a new "node" transitional package which depends on "ax25-node"
and conflicts with "nodejs-legacy".
Checksums-Sha1:
ae1b2518868bb5885d05b7120caa34929496acb1 1837 node_0.3.2-7.2.dsc
52159a083920913e13c1c2539c68accb3607817c 6501 node_0.3.2-7.2.diff.gz
5d46b4baac85ec6935a25f26926fd7902626495a 54430 ax25-node_0.3.2-7.2_amd64.deb
b6985c94418f16784b8e97646e708c5bb9371373 2654 node_0.3.2-7.2_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
be470c939cb3bb7e6b04d418cffdbeda009f4079d4845e50e4f5a2446382ad9e 1837 node_0.3.2-7.2.dsc
e81315daa0a6e22fefd7fdac0d76d59daa622a3e128f6f40e5ffe5da153668c1 6501 node_0.3.2-7.2.diff.gz
e68f4d31057dfe1a37ade3315f447f34af0a156eba3fc4710cbee1a24f49d2fe 54430 ax25-node_0.3.2-7.2_amd64.deb
4daa8999f5ae66f5a7f490cd0c375c8e137107dc218ad7a5d26a11aec2a2ff42 2654 node_0.3.2-7.2_all.deb
Files:
31feb80a5b6323484d70e05271a3392a 1837 hamradio optional node_0.3.2-7.2.dsc
0a4436271e30bee8af8b41abc216828c 6501 hamradio optional node_0.3.2-7.2.diff.gz
9f7d2199d740c0529169cc129fb3f77d 54430 hamradio optional ax25-node_0.3.2-7.2_amd64.deb
d52f8be432fe7ad1a48fc18d70932ccf 2654 oldlibs extra node_0.3.2-7.2_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=0QAa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: