Accepted ckport 0.1~rc1-2 (source all)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:02:55 +0200
Source: ckport
Binary: ckport ckport-database
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1~rc1-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Patrick Matthäi <pmatthaei@debian.org>
Changed-By: Patrick Matthäi <pmatthaei@debian.org>
Description:
ckport - portability analysis and security checking tool
ckport-database - portability analysis and security checking tool (Database files)
Changes:
ckport (0.1~rc1-2) experimental; urgency=low
.
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.4 (no changes needed).
* Switch to xz compression and add a Pre-Depends on dpkg.
Checksums-Sha1:
2e7660cd13b45217a24398f5bb521116d9d7ffc1 1764 ckport_0.1~rc1-2.dsc
750549dd824b035bc68b9d909f540158f827c33b 2651 ckport_0.1~rc1-2.debian.tar.gz
600315412ccd977c5571c88c6f13fc5c6917fee7 8844 ckport_0.1~rc1-2_all.deb
540503958e6012e4b2af3f8800dcd3561215cc3d 5666 ckport-database_0.1~rc1-2_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
62b167008d8ea5630f4065cfb31f55c180401f42adddad06dcec60a7e1df4c30 1764 ckport_0.1~rc1-2.dsc
313d6e332963b6a2bcbc9d824736ee227dfac581bcfb519eb216276abd8c2729 2651 ckport_0.1~rc1-2.debian.tar.gz
cd805d3db25ca0a5396c72e5019125c3bbe41ff80b311c8683122c8318426c01 8844 ckport_0.1~rc1-2_all.deb
a9d6e2425c6957a36bb6763e6481cd22688023a2084bdf85d38541eebcf1af51 5666 ckport-database_0.1~rc1-2_all.deb
Files:
060be59eee50909b2c715585c630a420 1764 devel optional ckport_0.1~rc1-2.dsc
30f22c9b631225ce3f7ac9208df993da 2651 devel optional ckport_0.1~rc1-2.debian.tar.gz
f71ef0a9f63660a041d10a6a22eed82c 8844 devel optional ckport_0.1~rc1-2_all.deb
39b74c96c90665b9aa27988e8cc582e4 5666 devel optional ckport-database_0.1~rc1-2_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=SvIl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: