Accepted xinetd 1:2.3.14-9~exp1 (source amd64)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 16:38:35 +0100
Source: xinetd
Binary: xinetd
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:2.3.14-9~exp1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Salvo 'LtWorf' Tomaselli <tiposchi@tiscali.it>
Changed-By: Salvo 'LtWorf' Tomaselli <tiposchi@tiscali.it>
Description:
xinetd - replacement for inetd with many enhancements
Changes:
xinetd (1:2.3.14-9~exp1) experimental; urgency=low
.
* Added $network in the LSB headers for the init script
* Added description in the LSB headers
* LSB headers indicate as providing itself and as replacement for inetd
* Fixes a typo and some warnings in man pages (patch in 000008-fix-manpages)
* Added a watch file
* Registers the faq html file with doc-base
* Added more details to the previous changelog entry
* Use correct debhelper version in the Build-Deps: 9 instead of 9.0.0
* Add DEP-3 headers to the 000007-CVE-2012-0862 patch
* Remove extra whitespace from debian/xinet.d/*
* Wrap debian/rules to 80 columns
Checksums-Sha1:
cf48ade6a81b39567856bd1ae1f5639c8af2dfb0 1872 xinetd_2.3.14-9~exp1.dsc
e59bf8e7ba0b2174fd6abe5a2fd9fe579689ccb3 29407 xinetd_2.3.14-9~exp1.debian.tar.gz
caf6bdf9997e10ed39d699331747939b6acbf169 151120 xinetd_2.3.14-9~exp1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
4082dd765281de4c8c51c4b5f36e8a8e3031b6fc1f644cfef70d9bc6e88b7f90 1872 xinetd_2.3.14-9~exp1.dsc
5fddbed44b6b658bbdc72d6914bd14e46f52fd64bbecbe90bd5c79b4c271db94 29407 xinetd_2.3.14-9~exp1.debian.tar.gz
b0e3a044e5c923e5b3abfdb0e97c88058e46b9681d54c3b2cae3275c20198ca3 151120 xinetd_2.3.14-9~exp1_amd64.deb
Files:
ae8532bcf1695ca1465abfd37a687d5e 1872 net extra xinetd_2.3.14-9~exp1.dsc
1148605d5efe53d020ef8a4721f2286b 29407 net extra xinetd_2.3.14-9~exp1.debian.tar.gz
d0375748b2a338308c0d40c3e1945694 151120 net extra xinetd_2.3.14-9~exp1_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)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=krTl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: