[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted prefix 1.1.0-1.1 (source amd64)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:22:54 +0100
Source: prefix
Binary: postgresql-8.4-prefix
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.1.0-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dimitri Fontaine <dim@tapoueh.org>
Changed-By: Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>
Description: 
 postgresql-8.4-prefix - Prefix Range module for PostgreSQL
Closes: 559610
Changes: 
 prefix (1.1.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * debian/{control, postgresql-8.3*, rules}
     - support only PostgreSQL 8.4, dropping support for 8.3; thanks to Martin
       Pitt for the report; Closes: #559610
Checksums-Sha1: 
 fac5d0f9f15b4e7e8a46af11559637833693e2af 986 prefix_1.1.0-1.1.dsc
 102cd50072722939b024d90e12b713714fbe250c 2212 prefix_1.1.0-1.1.diff.gz
 0e025bce151fe4ae48b7be11bd5f24da364b882a 19704 postgresql-8.4-prefix_1.1.0-1.1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 5ef1a733ec3306715df2f03b266790d6e809a8e466199bb92b34d0afa1068050 986 prefix_1.1.0-1.1.dsc
 303118cada322dba1f34778e01f02e39a710fd768758534ec8b7fcb9f17f9483 2212 prefix_1.1.0-1.1.diff.gz
 6eb53d69013e8e89974246c50dcae2a2a3c0e3a2e55a1be3dc2c0fc11be92d3e 19704 postgresql-8.4-prefix_1.1.0-1.1_amd64.deb
Files: 
 88e1e047d6409e5c1e9c4d52501fde43 986 database extra prefix_1.1.0-1.1.dsc
 34174a26a8caba9ad1190dd4b6208106 2212 database extra prefix_1.1.0-1.1.diff.gz
 3c41dd484d51cfcb1bf7e3eb463e31ee 19704 database extra postgresql-8.4-prefix_1.1.0-1.1_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkt9QzQACgkQAukwV0RN2VCF1wCfWR2M70DzRkVUB0UyCsMcjkPW
eUcAnj/DIfiwIDc0j2PmjJHIGwrTE0d4
=4WSy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
postgresql-8.4-prefix_1.1.0-1.1_amd64.deb
  to main/p/prefix/postgresql-8.4-prefix_1.1.0-1.1_amd64.deb
prefix_1.1.0-1.1.diff.gz
  to main/p/prefix/prefix_1.1.0-1.1.diff.gz
prefix_1.1.0-1.1.dsc
  to main/p/prefix/prefix_1.1.0-1.1.dsc


Reply to: