[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted stlport5.1 5.1.5-2 (source i386)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:02:34 +0000
Source: stlport5.1
Binary: libstlport5.1-dev libstlport5.1ldbl libstlport5.1-dbg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 5.1.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Torsten Werner <twerner@debian.org>
Changed-By: Thomas Girard <thomas.g.girard@free.fr>
Description: 
 libstlport5.1-dbg - STLport C++ class library debug symbols
 libstlport5.1-dev - STLport C++ class library
 libstlport5.1ldbl - STLport C++ class library
Closes: 465395 468063
Changes: 
 stlport5.1 (5.1.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fix FTBFS with g++ 4.3. Thanks to Daniel Schepler for reporting this.
     Closes: #468063.
   * Enhance fix-warnings.diff with another patch from Norbert Kiesel. While
     I'm at it also fix g++ 4.3 new warnings. Closes: #465395.
Files: 
 615fdb3763796435db82e9117dd2ee3a 868 devel optional stlport5.1_5.1.5-2.dsc
 0a2d440369973b05be736b217e2185ec 11521 devel optional stlport5.1_5.1.5-2.diff.gz
 1d262ff3b14a07db2b3c4aaeb5b0dc5e 452960 libdevel optional libstlport5.1-dev_5.1.5-2_i386.deb
 294e02b73aa058b13eb07bcd6e6e969a 226560 libs optional libstlport5.1ldbl_5.1.5-2_i386.deb
 097307cd05a29cbb881cbcf3cf69349e 913090 libs extra libstlport5.1-dbg_5.1.5-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFH4Z2Dz2LXlDjmjg4RAikJAJ4vtf7mI+MS4AFGY50S8RWxSy2tMQCfVneR
yYHtcQHxonzBUSGoc4NvpmE=
=JeK5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
libstlport5.1-dbg_5.1.5-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/stlport5.1/libstlport5.1-dbg_5.1.5-2_i386.deb
libstlport5.1-dev_5.1.5-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/stlport5.1/libstlport5.1-dev_5.1.5-2_i386.deb
libstlport5.1ldbl_5.1.5-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/stlport5.1/libstlport5.1ldbl_5.1.5-2_i386.deb
stlport5.1_5.1.5-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/stlport5.1/stlport5.1_5.1.5-2.diff.gz
stlport5.1_5.1.5-2.dsc
  to pool/main/s/stlport5.1/stlport5.1_5.1.5-2.dsc


Reply to: