[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted libspf2 1.2.5.dfsg-4 (source i386)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 15:39:22 +0200
Source: libspf2
Binary: spfquery libspf2-2 libspf2-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.5.dfsg-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Magnus Holmgren <magnus@kibibyte.se>
Changed-By: Magnus Holmgren <magnus@kibibyte.se>
Description: 
 libspf2-2  - library for validating mail senders with SPF
 libspf2-dev - Header and development libraries for libspf2
 spfquery   - query SPF (Sender Policy Framework) to validate mail senders
Closes: 440147
Changes: 
 libspf2 (1.2.5.dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Added 23_spfquery_ipv6.dpatch: Make spfquery accept IPv6 addresses
     (Closes: #440147). Thanks to Matthias Cramer.
   * 35_untabify_help.dpatch: Make --help output of utilities less ugly by
     converting tabs to spaces.
Files: 
 25f084300db5b67ea7c79d58e521e059 719 libs optional libspf2_1.2.5.dfsg-4.dsc
 b023c22a222c6d1aac34d13c2f211e99 10758 libs optional libspf2_1.2.5.dfsg-4.diff.gz
 a04eb0e49e930f600a402a319cc9c531 70604 libdevel optional libspf2-dev_1.2.5.dfsg-4_i386.deb
 511757febe3b73a85212842aea361b2e 51834 libs optional libspf2-2_1.2.5.dfsg-4_i386.deb
 f627834ce39f3d931cbfa02b4f9d2644 26790 mail optional spfquery_1.2.5.dfsg-4_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG3t1MST77jl1k+HARAgJAAJ4jVXJgQrFYlp796DLDdtYZch6CEgCfTK0A
OZnDrwD+BKfzHaWlFw7L7tE=
=I8f0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
libspf2-2_1.2.5.dfsg-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libs/libspf2/libspf2-2_1.2.5.dfsg-4_i386.deb
libspf2-dev_1.2.5.dfsg-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libs/libspf2/libspf2-dev_1.2.5.dfsg-4_i386.deb
libspf2_1.2.5.dfsg-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libs/libspf2/libspf2_1.2.5.dfsg-4.diff.gz
libspf2_1.2.5.dfsg-4.dsc
  to pool/main/libs/libspf2/libspf2_1.2.5.dfsg-4.dsc
spfquery_1.2.5.dfsg-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libs/libspf2/spfquery_1.2.5.dfsg-4_i386.deb



Reply to: