[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted shell-fm 0.2+svn20070605.r215-1 (source amd64)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:01:53 +0200
Source: shell-fm
Binary: shell-fm
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.2+svn20070605.r215-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nacho Barrientos Arias <nacho@debian.org>
Changed-By: Nacho Barrientos Arias <nacho@debian.org>
Description: 
 shell-fm   - console based player for last.fm radio streams
Closes: 427378
Changes: 
 shell-fm (0.2+svn20070605.r215-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New SVN snapshot
    + Added patch to fix a weird behaviour with non-ascii characters (merged
      upstream directly) (closes: #427378).
      Thanks to Eugeniy Meshcheryakov <eugen@debian.org>
    + Fixed discovery mode.
    + Code clean up and minor fixes.
   * debian/{rules,control}
    + Disabling libao support in non-supported architectures, it renders
      shell-fm unusable in those architectures.
Files: 
 62db2c35a8566ea8a3a997160994c281 684 sound extra shell-fm_0.2+svn20070605.r215-1.dsc
 ec47d17f60df0a2b8384e74da7e3531d 112761 sound extra shell-fm_0.2+svn20070605.r215.orig.tar.gz
 2294ea241de22c72da5dfaf9a7975aba 4351 sound extra shell-fm_0.2+svn20070605.r215-1.diff.gz
 9d4db589989dd7f7fb72a9ec41405483 32166 sound extra shell-fm_0.2+svn20070605.r215-1_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGZXCymbOM+OED/E0RAgBxAJ9YOLXHlSpKTpXLUmsUnrtiwubrzgCgkwQ5
3mQsuE5hn+yLQjn0WDIrYD8=
=M9h8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
shell-fm_0.2+svn20070605.r215-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/shell-fm/shell-fm_0.2+svn20070605.r215-1.diff.gz
shell-fm_0.2+svn20070605.r215-1.dsc
  to pool/main/s/shell-fm/shell-fm_0.2+svn20070605.r215-1.dsc
shell-fm_0.2+svn20070605.r215-1_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/s/shell-fm/shell-fm_0.2+svn20070605.r215-1_amd64.deb
shell-fm_0.2+svn20070605.r215.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/s/shell-fm/shell-fm_0.2+svn20070605.r215.orig.tar.gz



Reply to: