[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted xserver-xorg-video-neomagic 1:1.1.1-5 (source i386)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:38:13 +0100
Source: xserver-xorg-video-neomagic
Binary: xserver-xorg-video-neomagic
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.1.1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force <debian-x@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
Description: 
 xserver-xorg-video-neomagic - X.Org X server -- Neomagic display driver
Closes: 412873
Changes: 
 xserver-xorg-video-neomagic (1:1.1.1-5) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Add link to xserver-xorg-core bug script, so that bugreports contain
     the user's config and log files.
   * Bump dependency on xserver-xorg-core to >= 2:1.1.1-11, as previous
     versions don't have the bug script.
   * Add patch to fix implicit declaration of abs(), which caused out-of-range
     modes calculation, thanks to Nicolas Khanukaev <nikolaikin@free.fr>
     (closes: #412873).
   * Add build-dep on quilt, and adapt debian/rules to handle the patches.
Files: 
 8c2653074b88c6d171c3b611cfc4fb6f 980 x11 optional xserver-xorg-video-neomagic_1.1.1-5.dsc
 a96d5638000da366d241d880433ed09e 91766 x11 optional xserver-xorg-video-neomagic_1.1.1-5.diff.gz
 7a3c9371c046b702f548fe9f2d039674 38562 x11 optional xserver-xorg-video-neomagic_1.1.1-5_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF5cO9mEvTgKxfcAwRAsLyAJ4vJAzKjfVl0jtI6XkJkZw/dSdTtQCbBQfT
ctwayYozzfMw4jIQqrls4LU=
=3fdu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
xserver-xorg-video-neomagic_1.1.1-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-neomagic/xserver-xorg-video-neomagic_1.1.1-5.diff.gz
xserver-xorg-video-neomagic_1.1.1-5.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-neomagic/xserver-xorg-video-neomagic_1.1.1-5.dsc
xserver-xorg-video-neomagic_1.1.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-neomagic/xserver-xorg-video-neomagic_1.1.1-5_i386.deb



Reply to: