[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted vrms 1.13 (source all)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:35:39 -0300
Source: vrms
Binary: vrms
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian vrms Maintainers <debian-vrms@lists.gag.com>
Changed-By: Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>
Description: 
 vrms       - virtual Richard M. Stallman
Closes: 161368 397445 403752 419147
Changes: 
 vrms (1.13) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Rogério Brito ]
   * Acknowledge the NMU work done by Christian Perrier;
   * debian/control: removed "Depends:" field completely;
   * debian/control: added "XS-Vcs-SVN:" field for our repository;
   * debian/control: added "XS-Homepage:" field for our homepage at alioth;
   * debian/control: updated my e-mail address;
   * debian/postinst: removed: it did nothing. Tks: Joey Hess (Closes: #419147);
   * debian/rules: change the rules so that the "arch: all" package is
     built in the "binary-indep" target, which is more correct than in
     the "binary-arch" target;
   * reasons/vrms: remove mpg123 entries. Tks: Daniel Kobras (Closes: #397445);
   * reasons/vrms: include tango-icon-theme. Tks: Chris Lamb (Closes: #403752);
   * vrms: don't complain with packages missing Section field. Tks: Joey Hess (Closes: #161368);
   * vrms: removed dependency on diagnostics.pm;
Files: 
 6030ba096d654d53290359caef0b7b8d 654 admin optional vrms_1.13.dsc
 78fc6760e48d9d298834db566d0d2e02 9832 admin optional vrms_1.13.tar.gz
 f10ca894c28ecde7e5527dbbb8890d80 11464 admin optional vrms_1.13_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREDAAYFAkagfJ0ACgkQscRzFz57S3P3qQCdEKnbbaNeYS6l119wYuPFVJ+G
44IAnidmeXDzEBs1x5UeQYJy6XynGxzh
=U04l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
vrms_1.13.dsc
  to pool/main/v/vrms/vrms_1.13.dsc
vrms_1.13.tar.gz
  to pool/main/v/vrms/vrms_1.13.tar.gz
vrms_1.13_all.deb
  to pool/main/v/vrms/vrms_1.13_all.deb



Reply to: