[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted gpgme1.0 1.1.4-1 (source i386)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 21:48:34 +0200
Source: gpgme1.0
Binary: libgpgme11 libgpgme11-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.1.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <jsogo@debian.org>
Changed-By: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <jsogo@debian.org>
Description: 
 libgpgme11 - GPGME - GnuPG Made Easy
 libgpgme11-dev - GPGME - GnuPG Made Easy
Changes: 
 gpgme1.0 (1.1.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream version
      + multiple_messages.dpatch: disabled, applied upstream
   * Bump debhelper compat level to 5. Disable line setting it in debian/rules
     file, which conflicts with debian/compat
   * Call distclean target only if Makefile exists, and don't ignore other
     errors.
   * Use ${source:Version}. Make the package bin-NMU safe.
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.7.2. No changes needed.
Files: 
 8f45eeb555170d93b6c72a4e97b778e7 642 libdevel optional gpgme1.0_1.1.4-1.dsc
 0a2d20f70e6e01a4869ad6b7497404ae 943219 libdevel optional gpgme1.0_1.1.4.orig.tar.gz
 5ce55cf8078e0c02de79a63480165087 582146 libdevel optional gpgme1.0_1.1.4-1.diff.gz
 429174fc539830c31cfdcb6237ae1645 410764 libdevel optional libgpgme11-dev_1.1.4-1_i386.deb
 44f39665e1a1b928f070948cce23ef0f 248030 libs optional libgpgme11_1.1.4-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGkUFgS+BYJZB4jhERAu/qAJ90uq4dekGpVnc+Q/KZFsfkEh168ACdGR4e
AnL8pBwFdtQjwCDdZZsu8HY=
=v72R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
gpgme1.0_1.1.4-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gpgme1.0/gpgme1.0_1.1.4-1.diff.gz
gpgme1.0_1.1.4-1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gpgme1.0/gpgme1.0_1.1.4-1.dsc
gpgme1.0_1.1.4.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/g/gpgme1.0/gpgme1.0_1.1.4.orig.tar.gz
libgpgme11-dev_1.1.4-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gpgme1.0/libgpgme11-dev_1.1.4-1_i386.deb
libgpgme11_1.1.4-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gpgme1.0/libgpgme11_1.1.4-1_i386.deb



Reply to: